Abubuker v. Gonzales
This text of Abubuker v. Gonzales (Abubuker v. Gonzales) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-2038
SOFIA HASSEN ABUBUKER,
Petitioner,
versus
ALBERTO R. GONZALES,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals. (A97-203-694)
Submitted: April 19, 2006 Decided: May 8, 2006
Before MOTZ, KING, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Rochelle A. Fortier Nwadibia, PRIVITERA & NWADIBIA, San Francisco, California, for Petitioner. Peter D. Keisler, Assistant Attorney General, Carol Federighi, Kenneth W. Rosenberg, DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Sofia Hassen Abubuker, a native and citizen of Ethiopia,
petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration
Appeals adopting and affirming the Immigration Judge’s denial of
relief. Our review discloses that the petition for review was
filed out of time. See 8 U.S.C.A. § 1252(b)(1) (West 2005)
(establishing thirty-day time frame for filing petition for
review).
We accordingly dismiss the petition for review for lack
of jurisdiction. See Stone v. INS, 514 U.S. 386, 405 (1995). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
- 2 -
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Abubuker v. Gonzales, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/abubuker-v-gonzales-ca4-2006.