Abrishamian v. Daley

112 F. App'x 923
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedNovember 15, 2004
Docket04-1683
StatusUnpublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 112 F. App'x 923 (Abrishamian v. Daley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Abrishamian v. Daley, 112 F. App'x 923 (4th Cir. 2004).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Azizollah Abrishamian appeals from the district court’s final order dismissing his civil action alleging employment discrimination. The order also denied Abrishamian’s motion to reconsider an earlier order denying all but one of his claims.

We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Abrishamian v. Daley, No. CA-00-2746-L (D.Md. Mar. 26, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Jay Dee/Mole Joint Venture v. Mayor & City Council
725 F. Supp. 2d 513 (D. Maryland, 2010)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
112 F. App'x 923, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/abrishamian-v-daley-ca4-2004.