Abrahams-Parra v. Stansberry
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-7408
ANDREW ABRAHAMS-PARRA,
Petitioner - Appellant,
versus
PATRICIA R. STANSBERRY, Warden,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. (CA-05-454-HC-BO)
Submitted: May 18, 2006 Decided: May 26, 2006
Before WIDENER and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Andrew Abrahams-Parra, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Andrew Abrahams-Parra, a federal prisoner, appeals the
district court’s orders denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241
(2000) petition and denying his motions for reconsideration. We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. Abrahams-Parra v. Stansberry, No. CA-05-454-HC-BO (E.D.N.C.
Aug. 12, 2005; filed Sept. 22, 2005 & entered Sept. 28, 2005; filed
Oct. 27, 2005 & entered Nov. 4, 2005). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
- 2 -
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Abrahams-Parra v. Stansberry (Abrahams-Parra v. Stansberry) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.