Abrahams-Parra v. Stansberry

Fourth Circuit

Abrahams-Parra v. Stansberry

182 F. App'x 262

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided May 26, 2006·No. No. 05-7408·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Andrew Abrahams-Parra, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s orders denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000) petition and denying his motions for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Abrahams-Parra v. Stansberry, No. CA-05-454-HC-BO (E.D.N.C. Aug. 12, 2005; filed Sept. 22, 2005 & entered Sept. 28, 2005; filed Oct. 27, 2005 & entered Nov. 4, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Andrew Abrahams-Parra, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s orders denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000) petition and denying his motions for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Abrahams-Parra v. Stansberry, No. CA-05-454-HC-BO (E.D.N.C. Aug. 12, 2005; filed Sept. 22, 2005 & entered Sept. 28, 2005; filed Oct. 27, 2005 & entered Nov. 4, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Abrahams-Parra v. Stansberry, 182 F. App'x 262 (4th Cir. 2006).

Pincite

182 F. App'x 262 (Abrahams-Parra v. Stansberry) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related