Abraham v. United States
This text of 31 Cust. Ct. 348 (Abraham v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[349]*349Opinion by
At the trial it was stipulated that the issue herein is similar in all material respects to that involved in United States v. Browne Vintners Co., Inc. (34 C. C. P. A. 112, C. A. D. 351) and that the merchandise, consisting of ladies’ kid gloves, in case No. 23821, which the inspector reported “manifested— not found,” was not in fact received by the importer. In accordance with stipulation of counsel and following the decision cited it was held that duty is not assessable upon such portions of the merchandise as were reported by the inspector as manifested, not found. The protest was sustained to this extent.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
31 Cust. Ct. 348, 1953 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1226, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/abraham-v-united-states-cusc-1953.