Abraham v. United States
35 Cust. Ct. 240
CourtUnited States Customs Court
DecidedSeptember 15, 1955
DocketNo. 59278; protests 193148-K, etc. (New York)
StatusPublished
This text of 35 Cust. Ct. 240 (Abraham v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Abraham v. United States, 35 Cust. Ct. 240 (cusc 1955).
Opinion
Opinion by
In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of traveling irons similar in all material respects to those the subject of Greatrex, Limited, and J. J. Gavin & Co., Inc. v. United States (33 Cust. Ct. 79, C. D. 1639), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Greatrex, Ltd. v. United States
33 Cust. Ct. 79 (U.S. Customs Court, 1954)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
35 Cust. Ct. 240, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/abraham-v-united-states-cusc-1955.