Abraham v. Department of Corrections

634 A.2d 214, 535 Pa. 122
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedDecember 20, 1993
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 634 A.2d 214 (Abraham v. Department of Corrections) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Abraham v. Department of Corrections, 634 A.2d 214, 535 Pa. 122 (Pa. 1993).

Opinion

535 Pa. 122 (1993)
634 A.2d 214

Lynne ABRAHAM, District Attorney for the City and County of Philadelphia, Appellant
v.
The DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS OF PENNSYLVANIA; Robert P. Casey, Governor of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania; Joan Reeves, in her official capacity as Commissioner of the Department of Human Services; J. Patrick Gallagher, in his official capacity as Commissioner of the Philadelphia Prison System; David Pingree, in his official capacity as Managing Director of Philadelphia; W. Wilson Goode, in his official capacity as Mayor of the City of Philadelphia; the City of Philadelphia; Reverend Albert F. Campbell, Labora M. Bennett, James D. Barber, Allen M. Hornblum, M. Mark Mendel, Donald J. Padova, each in his or her official capacity as a member of the Board of Trustees of the Philadelphia Prison System; Harry Moore, in his official capacity as Warden for Holmesburg Prison; Wilhelmina Speach, in her official capacity as Warden of the Detention Center; and Elsa Legesse, in her official capacity as Warden of the House of Correction, Appellees.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

Argued December 6, 1993.
Decided December 20, 1993.
Reargument Denied April 6, 1994.

Sarah B. Vandenbraak, for District Atty.

William E. Fairall, Camp Hill, for Com.

James B. Jordan, Philadelphia, for City of Philadelphia.

John W. Packel, Philadelphia, for amicus-Defender Assoc. of Philadelphia.

Before NIX, C.J., and FLAHERTY, ZAPPALA, PAPADAKOS, CAPPY and MONTEMURO, JJ.

*123 ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Order affirmed.

LARSEN, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.

PAPADAKOS and CAPPY, JJ., dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Commonwealth v. Dunlap
846 A.2d 674 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 2004)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
634 A.2d 214, 535 Pa. 122, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/abraham-v-department-of-corrections-pa-1993.