Abraham Rios v. Jefferson Sessions

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided July 19, 2017·No. 15-73579·Unpublished

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUL 19 2017 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ABRAHAM RIOS, No. 15-73579

Petitioner, Agency No. A205-297-724

v. MEMORANDUM* JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS III, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted July 11, 2017**

Before: CANBY, KOZINSKI, and HAWKINS, Circuit Judges.

Abraham Rios, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the

Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying administrative closure and

dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) order of removal. We

dismiss the petition for review.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). We lack jurisdiction to review the BIA’s denial of administrative closure.

Diaz-Covarrubias v. Mukasey, 551 F.3d 1114, 1118-20 (9th Cir. 2009).

We lack jurisdiction to consider Rios’ unexhausted contentions that the IJ

failed to apply mandatory presumptions in his favor and applied legally erroneous

standards of proof. See Tijani v. Holder, 628 F.3d 1071, 1080 (9th Cir. 2010)

(“We lack jurisdiction to review legal claims not presented in an alien’s

administrative proceedings before the BIA.”).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED.

2 15-73579

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Abraham Rios v. Jefferson Sessions, (9th Cir. 2017).

Abraham Rios v. Jefferson Sessions (Abraham Rios v. Jefferson Sessions) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Tijani v. Holder
628 F.3d 1071 (Ninth Circuit, 2010)
Diaz-Covarrubias v. Mukasey
551 F.3d 1114 (Ninth Circuit, 2009)