Abraham Rios v. Jefferson Sessions

694 F. App'x 534
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided July 19, 2017·No. 15-73579·Unpublished

Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Abraham Rios, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying administrative closure and dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) order of removal. We dismiss the petition for review.

We lack jurisdiction to review the BIA’s denial of administrative closure. Diaz-Covarrubias v. Mukasey, 551 F.3d 1114, 1118-20 (9th Cir. 2009).

We lack jurisdiction to consider Rios’ unexhausted contentions that the IJ failed to apply mandatory presumptions in his favor and applied legally erroneous standards of proof. See Tijani v. Holder, 628 F.3d 1071, 1080 (9th Cir. 2010) (“We lack jurisdiction to review legal claims not presented in an alien’s administrative proceedings before the BIA.”).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED.

**

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Abraham Rios v. Jefferson Sessions, 694 F. App'x 534 (9th Cir. 2017).

694 F. App'x 534 (Abraham Rios v. Jefferson Sessions) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Tijani v. Holder
628 F.3d 1071 (Ninth Circuit, 2010)
Diaz-Covarrubias v. Mukasey
551 F.3d 1114 (Ninth Circuit, 2009)