Abner Wynn Gordon v. The John Deere Company

466 F.2d 1200, 1972 U.S. App. LEXIS 7511
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedSeptember 18, 1972
Docket71-1824
StatusPublished
Cited by22 cases

This text of 466 F.2d 1200 (Abner Wynn Gordon v. The John Deere Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Abner Wynn Gordon v. The John Deere Company, 466 F.2d 1200, 1972 U.S. App. LEXIS 7511 (5th Cir. 1972).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

The disposition of this case rests on the answer to a question that we certified to the Supreme Court of Florida. 1 Fla.Stat. § 25.031, F.S.A., Fla.App. Rules 4.61, 32 F.S.A.

The question certified was whether or not Florida Statutes, Section 48.182 (1970), F.S.A., applies retroactively to allow service under its provisions as to an alleged wrongful act committed prior to the enactment of the statute. The Supreme Court of Florida has ruled that § 48.182 is not to be retroactively applied. 2 This ruling is consistent with the position taken by the district court, 320 F.Supp. 293, in dismissing the action against Deere & Company and John Deere of Baltimore.

Appellant contends that service of process on foreign corporations in federal diversity actions should be governed by a uniform federal standard, rather than by the state law standard of the state in which the federal court sits. We have previously held otherwise. Stanga v. McCormick Shipping Corp., 268 F.2d 544 (5th Cir. 1959); Time, Inc. v. Manning, 366 F.2d 690 (5th Cir. *1201 1966); Woodham v. Northwestern Steel & Wire Co., 390 F.2d 27 (5th Cir. 1968). 3

The district court’s order, therefore, must be affirmed.

Affirmed.

1

. The facts of the case and the certified question are reported at 451 F.2d 234 (5th Cir. 1971).

2

. Gordon v. John Deere Co., 264 So.2d 419 (Fla.1972).

3

. For a thorough discussion of the issue and a collection of cases from other Circuits see Arrowsmith v. United Press International, 320 F.2d 219 (2nd Cir. 1963) (En Banc).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Glaspie v. Carter
W.D. Louisiana, 2023
Platypus Wear, Inc. v. Clarke Modet & Co., Inc.
515 F. Supp. 2d 1288 (S.D. Florida, 2007)
Brown v. Seebach
763 F. Supp. 574 (S.D. Florida, 1991)
Murphy v. Republic Health Corp.
645 F. Supp. 124 (S.D. Florida, 1986)
Moltz v. Seneca Balance, Inc.
606 F. Supp. 612 (S.D. Florida, 1985)
Tellschow v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.
585 F. Supp. 593 (S.D. Florida, 1984)
Bloom v. AH Pond Co., Inc.
519 F. Supp. 1162 (S.D. Florida, 1981)
Mallard v. Aluminum Co. of Canada
634 F.2d 236 (Fifth Circuit, 1981)
Edwards v. Gulf Mississippi Marine Corp.
449 F. Supp. 1363 (S.D. Texas, 1978)
Szczepanski v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.
558 F.2d 732 (Fifth Circuit, 1977)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
466 F.2d 1200, 1972 U.S. App. LEXIS 7511, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/abner-wynn-gordon-v-the-john-deere-company-ca5-1972.