Abila v. Padilla

14 Cal. 103
CourtCalifornia Supreme Court
DecidedJuly 1, 1859
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 14 Cal. 103 (Abila v. Padilla) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Abila v. Padilla, 14 Cal. 103 (Cal. 1859).

Opinion

Cope, J.

delivered the opinion of the Court—Baldwin, J. concurring.

This was a proceeding in the Probate Court of Los AngelesCounty, upon a petition praying for the probate of a will, and the issuance of letters testamentary. The petition was presented to the Probate Judge on the 15th of October, 1858, and' on the same day he issued' a citation to the heirs of the deceased, [106]*106citing them to appear on the 1st of November, 1858—the day designated for the hearing of the petition, and show cause why the prayer of the petition should not be granted. On the day appointed, certain of the heirs appeared in Court, and, through their counsel, moved to dismiss the application and proceedings of the petitioners, on the ground of objections to the service of the citation. The Court overruled the motion, and the parties thereupon answered to the merits of the petition.

It is unnecessary for us to decide the question raised on the argument, whether these parties, in answering the petition, waived any of their rights under their preliminary motion to dismiss. That motion, as made, was properly overruled, for, however well grounded the objections to the service of the citation may have been, they could only affect the service itself, and did not invalidate any other portion of the proceedings. The answer gave the Court jurisdiction of the parties, and it is perfectly immaterial whether a citation ever issued.

J udgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Estate of Palm
156 P.2d 62 (California Court of Appeal, 1945)
Stead v. Curtis
205 F. 439 (Ninth Circuit, 1913)
Estate of Ricks
117 P. 539 (California Supreme Court, 1911)
Estate of Kearney
109 P. 37 (California Court of Appeal, 1910)
Zeeder v. Regents of the University
13 Cal. App. 92 (California Court of Appeal, 1910)
Curtis v. Underwood
36 P. 110 (California Supreme Court, 1894)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
14 Cal. 103, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/abila-v-padilla-cal-1859.