Abelardo Gerardo Gonzalez v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided October 13, 2015·No. 04-15-00530-CR·Published

Opinion

IN TOE FODRTe COURT OF APPEALS SAN ANTONIO, TE5CAS

ABELAKDO G- GONZALEZ 1622682 § > ^ crt

§ COA No. 04-15-005^^ ^ oQ :rtO^ 5r> § ^ j—

vs. §s COA No. 04-15-0053l-C^ev, . O ^_o Oo!^ z-'iO J r* _ mSi . 9-i' THE STATE OF TEXAS § COA No. 04-15-0053 ffT!

Appelle § cn o

AMQIDIENT TO COURT OUSRED REPLY

now COMB'S Afcjpellant ABELARDO G. GONZALEZ, pro-se in the above mention proceediny's and file's this Amendment to appellant's filiny dated Oct. 03, 15 entitled COURT ORDERED REPLY.

I- AMENm^

Appellant reserved the riyht to amend his filiny of Oct. 03, 15 on paye 4 VIII. AMENDING REPLY and thusfor sufccnitt this filinq to be incorporated and considered for all purpase's toyether with his prior fifliny of Oct. 03, 2015.

II. EXHIBITS

The followiny exhibits are being introduced that where refered to in his Oct. 03, 2015 submission among other's:

3, Judgment of Conviction by Jury Sheet 657?COA#529 5, Request for the Preparation of the clerk Record 11, Letter from coa Clerk showing Appellants wrcny address for case 531 12, Letter from coa Clerl showing Appellants wrong address for case 529 13, Letter to Trail Court Clerk date 10-5- 2015 to sut^lement the. CR Tcecord

1/8 III. COURTS JURISDICTION

Appellant's state's for the record/ that he has [N]Or seen the Trial Court CLERK RECORD, after requesting the the record fron both the Trail Clerk and the Appellant ClerK SEE Exhibits 7, 8/ 9 and has been prejudice, since with out veiwing he CAN NOT do what the Appeal's court want him to do on the CSIDER by the Court to submit a letter to the Trial Court to file a supplement reco rd, but nevertheless has filed the followiny Exhibit 13 with the trial court clerk.

Also Appellant state's the following on the v^uestion of this court's juris diction: That it appears this court has jurisdiction since che appeal beiny sought is from the SECOND MOTION TO RECUSE, which is appealable under T-R-Civ- Pro. RULE 18a(j)(l)(A) from [final judgment].

A final judgpient as been entered in the three proceeding's since a conviction has been made on Jan. 15, 2010 SEE Exhibits 1, 2, 3, Judgment of Conviction sheets, and thusfor has jurisdiction SEE the following:

McKnow V. State, 915 S.W. 2d 842 @161 (Tx.App.-Fort Worth 1996)

Ex parte Shumake, 953 S.W. 2d 842 @844 (Tx.App.-Austin 1997) citing Mcknow Wright v. State, 969 S.W. 2d 588 @589 (Tx.App.-Dalias 1998) citing Ex parte Shumake Ex Parte Silva, 963 S.W. 2d 945 @946 (Tx.App.El Paso 1998) citing Workman v State McKnow V State, Ex Parte Shumake

Courson v. State, 996 S.W. 2d 348 @349 (Tx.APP.-Houston[14th Dist.] 1995)

Ex parte Culver 932 S.W. 2d 207 @210 (Tx.App.-El Paso 1996) Workman v. State, 170 Tex. Crim. 621, 343 S.W.2d 446, 0447 (1961)

U.S. V. Truesdale, 211, F.3d, 898 @905 (5th Cir. 2000) citing n.7 Firstier Morgage Co. 498 U.S. 269, 273-74, 111 S.Ct 648, 112 L.Ed, 2d 743 (1991) @651

iTjhe above mention Courts of Appeal's, Texas Crim. Court of Appeal. Fifth Cir. and U.S. Supreme Court authorities among others [g]ive jurisdiction to this court to rule on this matter of the Denail of Appellants SECOND MOTION TO RECUSE

z/8 ALlERNATELYt Appellcint asks the Honorable Court/ clerk for there assistance which is available under Tex. Rules of Appellant Pro. RULE 34.5(d) DEFECTS OR INACCURACIES Which state's in part:

[] if the clerk record is defective or inaccrate (the appellate clerk) must inform the trial court clerk of the defect or inaccuracy and instruct the clerk to make the correction.

IT IS IMPORTANT TO STRESS THAT APPELLANT HAS [nJOT SEEN THE RECORD FILED/ BUT JUST KNOWS ITS OVER 1000 PAGES LONG IN TWO CASE"S AND CLOSE TO 1000 PAGES LONG ON THE THIRD/ thiia is not what appellant requested to be filed SEE Exhibit 5.

IV- PRAYER

Appellant PRAY'S this court not to dimiss the case's but to more forward since this is [N]ot a interlocutory appeal since a conviction has been had and futhermore asks alternately to assist PRO—SE Appellant since he has not veiwed the trial CLERK record can can not ask to correct somethiny that he does not seen thuefore does not know whats wrony.

Respectfully subrKitted,

^7/ Abelardo y. Gonzalez 1622682 C.T. Terrell B-3-40 1300 F.M. 655 Roaliaron, Texas 77583 Appellant/ Pro-se

3/8 Case No. 2008CRR000657U1 Count i & \ ii iNCIDKiVr No./TIIN': 9!2730:}tlfi5;j

The State of Texas § In the 49TH District § V. § Court § ABELARDO GERARDO GONZALEZ § WEBB County. TkX:\s § ST,\l-K ID No.; TX0r>0!)5C2!) §

Judgment of Conviction by Jury rri>9iiiliiii: IION. JOSE A. I<0FEZ _ . _ _ n.it«-Jiiiltjim-Iit _ r-jl'invil 1/1.1/2010 / / , r .Ariiiint y liir Sl;ilr SERCjIO I.OZANO ..x- .and Aii i>fvi (JSC .AK rr..\.A, SIk blAVARI) NOIJCN / OITi-iisi- I'm' x^ich ni'rt^iliiij.t / .AtRniAV.ATKD ROBBER\"f/J-COUNT I AND {/ ENGAGlNGJN.ORa\NIZKprjRlMlN.AI^^^ / '• ChiirKiiiig Instnimi'nl: SjjilMlf for onimsf

(irOITtlllitv njf _

Di'Er«:i" nf.Qfffiiujf _ j./jf. I'joiLf" QO'".!!""';jj . - - 1ST DEGREE FELONY _ _ NPT.<'y".i''Y_ _ // _ . . Wnlirl iif.liirv I'Olihiji;s itjj Oriiilll VVr.tliWr (lUlLTY N/A* '/ Pli'ii to I'= Knh.'iiK't-ini'iil Plt'Jt to 2'"' Kiih;iiici;iiii»iityH:iiii(ii:il I'iii;tKra|ihj_ _ N/A_ _ . .. . _ _ „ . I'liutincs on !•' Kiihanivnifiii KmilmU-i oii 2""' PariiKfiipli; N/A KiihiinrKiiii'm/llaliUtial Pai.'iKrapli: N/.A l*uiii>liril .iaM's.atl. Sii. D.in> .Sonli'iirt' Ininosinl; i'i'U; ."'latli-tiri' in C'tjiuiiii-ciir. .fy!lY_ _ 1 _ _ 1/15/2010 I'i.n..liimni at..) Plan- YEARS INSTITUTIONAI. DIVISION. TDCJ -FEK COUNT ul (.onliiu'iilfiil: _ . _ __ THI.S SKXTRNCK SlUl.t. RUN C.'ONCURRENTl A'.

Q SKNTKNCK OKCONKINKMKNTSOSPKNOKU, DUKKNDANT l»l.-\CK.I>ON CO.M.MOM IV.Sl.'I'KKVISION KOK N/.A . I'nif CoiirlLCtifil.t lli'j.l_iliiiiiiiJ Ufsi iMil.iiiM (.'nya'"!''jo j 111 mm 00 PKlt COUNT $435.00 $ N/A C victim (m-i-1hJoivi jl! AtiKNCV/.VOKNTiM .. ImJi.w Sex Offrnder KcKistratiuii Requirements do not apply to the Dcrendani. 'IT:\ C' iDK Ckim Piiii'" rli.i|i(iir (i2 The .ace ofIlievifiimat the timeof llie offense was N/A • Uni'liaidiinxisjo scrvx-seji!unr!.'.li).'l'IJCJi enter iiiriiivvxi?!W'J J".t.i'kI-..iiit:hn)p(iliiiiii'..ii init-r I niiii 2/M/200K lo .1/M/200H Kimn 1/11/2010 -.<• l/I2/2tM» Kioni I/iri/20ll) n. l/l.-i/2nit) Kiiirii to Kriiiii to Kiiiiti :ii (Vediteii. IrlVtifQtlimi ISlii^yeru'»*iit|.|ii:e m inutlty jaii i.T is jjnen i.n'ili: i<.i.;oil liiie iiiiii • ifiit' i it i)> i n ilii. -I l» li » 32 DAYS NO TES: TOWARD INCARCERATION Alt tirrlinrtn inffirtiiaiiuii. inoiiri. aiiiIasMchiaiiriils hiiticAiril .ibriir are inmrpiirali'ii iiitiitlir laiiniiai;*' et ilie|tiili

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Abelardo Gerardo Gonzalez v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2015).

Abelardo Gerardo Gonzalez v. State (Abelardo Gerardo Gonzalez v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Courson v. State
996 S.W.2d 348 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1999)
Ex Parte Silva
963 S.W.2d 945 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1998)
Workman v. State
343 S.W.2d 446 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1961)
Ex Parte Shumake
953 S.W.2d 842 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1997)
Wright v. State
969 S.W.2d 588 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1998)
Ex Parte Culver
932 S.W.2d 207 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1996)