Abel v. Cecil

35 A.2d 646, 182 Md. 623
CourtCourt of Appeals of Maryland
DecidedFebruary 3, 1944
Docket[No. 41, January Term, 1944.]
StatusPublished

This text of 35 A.2d 646 (Abel v. Cecil) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Maryland primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Abel v. Cecil, 35 A.2d 646, 182 Md. 623 (Md. 1944).

Opinion

The following opinion was delivered Per Curiam:

The same question presented in the above-entitled case having been submitted, argued and decided in County Commissioners of Anne Arundel County v. English, 182 Md. 514, 35 A. 2d 135, in which the appellee in this case, with the permission of this court, adopted the brief of amici curise on behalf of County Commissioners of Baltimore County, and one of its counsel having argued the appeal on behalf of Anne Arundel County, and this appeal having been submitted by counsel for all parties for such action as this court may consider proper, the decree appealed from will be reversed.

Decree reversed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

County Commissioners v. English
35 A.2d 135 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1943)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
35 A.2d 646, 182 Md. 623, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/abel-v-cecil-md-1944.