Abdur'Rahman v. Bell
537 U.S. 88, 123 S. Ct. 594, 154 L. Ed. 2d 501, 2002 U.S. LEXIS 9240
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided December 10, 2002·No. 01-9094·Published·Cited by 18 cases
Opinions
The writ of certiorari is dismissed as improvidently granted.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Abdur'Rahman v. Bell, 537 U.S. 88, 123 S. Ct. 594, 154 L. Ed. 2d 501, 2002 U.S. LEXIS 9240 (2002).
537 U.S. 88 (Abdur'Rahman v. Bell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Oswald v. Buesgen
E.D. Wisconsin, 2022
Abdur'Rahman v. Bredesen
181 S.W.3d 292 (Tennessee Supreme Court, 2005)
Gonzalez v. Crosby
545 U.S. 524 (Supreme Court, 2005)
In Re Abu-Ali Abdur'rahman, Movant. Abu-Ali Abdur'rahman v. Ricky Bell, Warden
392 F.3d 174 (Sixth Circuit, 2004)
In re: Abdur'Rahman v.
Sixth Circuit, 2004
Sanders v. McCaughtry
333 F. Supp. 2d 797 (E.D. Wisconsin, 2004)
Gonzalez v. Secretary for the Department of Corrections
366 F.3d 1253 (Eleventh Circuit, 2004)
United States v. Neuhausser
81 F. App'x 56 (Sixth Circuit, 2003)
Foster v. United States
290 F. Supp. 2d 5 (District of Columbia, 2003)
Cooey v. Bradshaw
216 F.R.D. 408 (N.D. Ohio, 2003)
Harper v. Vaughn
272 F. Supp. 2d 527 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 2003)
United States v. Harris
268 F. Supp. 2d 500 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 2003)
Abdur'Rahman v. Bell
537 U.S. 88 (Supreme Court, 2002)
Maurice Carl Gitten v. United States
311 F.3d 529 (Second Circuit, 2002)