Abdur-Raheem v. Goord

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Abdur-Raheem v. Goord

260 A.D.2d 754, 689 N.Y.S.2d 252, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3663

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 8, 1999

StatusPublished

This text of 260 A.D.2d 754 (Abdur-Raheem v. Goord) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Abdur-Raheem v. Goord, 260 A.D.2d 754, 689 N.Y.S.2d 252, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3663 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

Pincite

Opinion

—Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule.

The Attorney General has advised this Court that the determination at issue in this proceeding has been reversed and that all references to the disciplinary hearing will be expunged from petitioner’s institutional record. Because petitioner has received all the relief to which he is entitled, the matter is dismissed as moot (see, Matter of Witherspoon v Goord, 243 AD2d 931).

Crew III, J. P., Spain, Carpinello and Graffeo, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the petition is dismissed, as moot, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule.

The Attorney General has advised this Court that the determination at issue in this proceeding has been reversed and that all references to the disciplinary hearing will be expunged from petitioner’s institutional record. Because petitioner has received all the relief to which he is entitled, the matter is dismissed as moot (see, Matter of Witherspoon v Goord, 243 AD2d 931).

Crew III, J. P., Spain, Carpinello and Graffeo, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the petition is dismissed, as moot, without costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

260 A.D.2d 754, 689 N.Y.S.2d 252, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3663, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/abdur-raheem-v-goord-nyappdiv-1999.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack