Abdullah v. State

744 S.W.2d 727, 294 Ark. 547, 1988 Ark. LEXIS 118
Supreme Court of Arkansas·Decided February 22, 1988·No. CR 87-139·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Darrell Hickman, Justice.

The appellant, Zakee Kaleem Abdullah, a/k/a Robert Earl White, appeals from an order of the trial court denying a motion to set aside his 1982 convictions. We denied the appellant relief under Rule 37 in 1984. Abdullah v. State, 281 Ark. 239, 663 S.W.2d 166 (1984). The appellant is merely attempting to avoid the rule which prohibits a second Rule 37 petition. Ruiz v. State, 280 Ark. 190, 655 S.W.2d 441 (1983). Furthermore, the appellant failed to abstract the record of the hearing which was held on this petition. The fact that he represents himself does not excuse him from complying with the rules of the court. Bryant v. Lockhart, 288 Ark. 302, 705 S.W.2d 9 (1986); Weston v. State, 265 Ark. 58, 576 S.W.2d 705 (1979).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Abdullah v. State, 744 S.W.2d 727, 294 Ark. 547, 1988 Ark. LEXIS 118 (Ark. 1988).

744 S.W.2d 727 (Abdullah v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Maulding v. State
776 S.W.2d 339 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1989)