Abdullah v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Abdullah v. State

744 S.W.2d 727, 294 Ark. 547, 1988 Ark. LEXIS 118

CourtSupreme Court of Arkansas

DecidedFebruary 22, 1988

DocketCR 87-139

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 744 S.W.2d 727 (Abdullah v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Abdullah v. State, 744 S.W.2d 727, 294 Ark. 547, 1988 Ark. LEXIS 118 (Ark. 1988).

Pincite

Opinion

Darrell Hickman, Justice.

The appellant, Zakee Kaleem Abdullah, a/k/a Robert Earl White, appeals from an order of the trial court denying a motion to set aside his 1982 convictions. We denied the appellant relief under Rule 37 in 1984. Abdullah v. State, 281 Ark. 239, 663 S.W.2d 166 (1984). The appellant is merely attempting to avoid the rule which prohibits a second Rule 37 petition. Ruiz v. State, 280 Ark. 190, 655 S.W.2d 441 (1983). Furthermore, the appellant failed to abstract the record of the hearing which was held on this petition. The fact that he represents himself does not excuse him from complying with the rules of the court. Bryant v. Lockhart, 288 Ark. 302, 705 S.W.2d 9 (1986); Weston v. State, 265 Ark. 58, 576 S.W.2d 705 (1979).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Darrell Hickman, Justice.

The appellant, Zakee Kaleem Abdullah, a/k/a Robert Earl White, appeals from an order of the trial court denying a motion to set aside his 1982 convictions. We denied the appellant relief under Rule 37 in 1984. Abdullah v. State, 281 Ark. 239, 663 S.W.2d 166 (1984). The appellant is merely attempting to avoid the rule which prohibits a second Rule 37 petition. Ruiz v. State, 280 Ark. 190, 655 S.W.2d 441 (1983). Furthermore, the appellant failed to abstract the record of the hearing which was held on this petition. The fact that he represents himself does not excuse him from complying with the rules of the court. Bryant v. Lockhart, 288 Ark. 302, 705 S.W.2d 9 (1986); Weston v. State, 265 Ark. 58, 576 S.W.2d 705 (1979).

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

744 S.W.2d 727, 294 Ark. 547, 1988 Ark. LEXIS 118, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/abdullah-v-state-ark-1988.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack