Abdul-Khaliq v. Ark. Dep't of Human Servs.
This text of 2013 Ark. App. 717 (Abdul-Khaliq v. Ark. Dep't of Human Servs.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Cite as 2013 Ark. App. 717
ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS DIVISION II No. CV-13-658
BILAL ABDUL-KHALIQ Opinion Delivered December 4, 2013
APPELLANT APPEAL FROM THE SEBASTIAN COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT, V. FORT SMITH DISTRICT [NO. JV-2004-356] ARKANSAS DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES and HONORABLE MARK HEWETT, MINOR CHILD JUDGE
APPELLEES AFFIRMED; MOTION TO WITHDRAW GRANTED
RHONDA K. WOOD, Judge
This is a no-merit appeal from an order terminating Bilal Abdul-Khaliq’s
parental rights to his child, MAK. Abdul-Khaliq’s appellate counsel has filed a brief
and motion to withdraw under Linker-Flores v. Arkansas Department of Human
Services, 359 Ark. 131, 194 S.W.3d 739 (2004), and Ark. Sup. Ct. R. 6-9(i) (2013).
Abdul-Khaliq was given an opportunity to file pro se points but has declined to do
so. We affirm and grant counsel’s motion because there is no meritorious basis for
an appeal.
MAK came into the Department of Human Services’s custody in January
2011. She had been living with her mother, who abandoned her after fleeing from
the police. Abdul-Khaliq, MAK’s father, only appeared at the probable-cause and
adjudication hearings. After that, he never went to court or contacted DHS. The Cite as 2013 Ark. App. 717
juvenile court terminated his parental rights in April 2013 on the grounds of
abandonment.
After examining the record we agree that an appeal would be meritless.
Counsel has complied with our requirements for no-merit termination cases: the
only adverse ruling was the termination order itself, and counsel has adequately
explained why there is no arguable basis to appeal that decision. We therefore
affirm by memorandum opinion, In re Memorandum Opinions, 16 Ark. App. 301,
700 S.W.2d 63 (1985), and grant the motion to withdraw.
Affirmed; motion to withdraw granted.
GLOVER and HIXSON, JJ., agree.
Deborah R. Sallings, Arkansas Public Defender Commission, for appellant.
No response.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2013 Ark. App. 717, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/abdul-khaliq-v-ark-dept-of-human-servs-arkctapp-2013.