Abdul-Haqq v. Permanente Medical Group, Inc.
This text of Abdul-Haqq v. Permanente Medical Group, Inc. (Abdul-Haqq v. Permanente Medical Group, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, N.D. California primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 JAMILAH ABDUL-HAQQ, Case No. 3:19-cv-03727-JD 8 Plaintiff, ORDER RE MOTION TO RETAIN 9 v. CONFIDENTIALITY 10 PERMANENTE MEDICAL GROUP, INC., Re: Dkt. No. 120 et al., Defendants. 12
13 For the motion re confidentiality, Dkt. No. 120, all medical and psychological records for 14 || plaintiff will be treated as highly confidential, and all employment records for plaintiff will be 3 15 || treated as confidential, under the stipulated protective order, Dkt. No. 117. All ECF filings that a 16 || disclose either category of information will be filed under seal with a request to seal that conforms 3 17 || to Civil Local Rule 79-5 and this Court’s sealing practices. See In re Google Play Store Antitrust 18 || Litig., --- F. Supp. 3d ---, 2021 WL 4190165 (N.D. Cal. 2021). 19 IT IS SO ORDERED. 20 Dated: March 3, 2022 21 22 73 JAMES/PONATO- United Ptates District Judge 24 25 26 27 28
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Abdul-Haqq v. Permanente Medical Group, Inc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/abdul-haqq-v-permanente-medical-group-inc-cand-2022.