Abdah v. Obama

D.C. Circuit

Abdah v. Obama

630 F.3d 1047, 394 U.S. App. D.C. 100, 2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 668, 2011 WL 101695

CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

DecidedJanuary 11, 2011

Docket05-5224, 05-5225, 05-5227, 05-5229, 05-5230, 05-5232, 05-5235, 05-5236, 05-5237, 05-5238, 05-5239, 05-5242, 05-5243, 05-5244, 05-5246, 05-5248, 05-5337, 05-5338, 05-5374, 05-5390, 05-5398, 05-5479, 05-5484, 05-5486, 06-5037, 06-5041, 06-5043, 06-5062, 06-5065, 06-5094

StatusPublished

Cited by6 cases

This text of 630 F.3d 1047 (Abdah v. Obama) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Abdah v. Obama, 630 F.3d 1047, 394 U.S. App. D.C. 100, 2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 668, 2011 WL 101695 (D.C. Cir. 2011).

Pincite

Opinions

ORDER

Appellees’ petition for initial en banc hearing and the response thereto were circulated to the full court, and a vote was requested. Thereafter, a majority of the judges eligible to participate did not vote in favor of the petition. Upon consideration of the foregoing, it is

ORDERED that the petition be denied.

* Circuit Judges Rogers, Tatel, and Griffith would grant the petition.

* A statement by Circuit Judge Griffith, with whom Circuit Judges Rogers and Ta-tel join, dissenting from the denial of initial en banc hearing, is attached.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI