Abbott v. Haight Properties, Inc.

Ohio Supreme Court

Abbott v. Haight Properties, Inc.

711 N.E.2d 1012, 86 Ohio St. 3d 1417, 1999 Ohio LEXIS 2248

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedJune 30, 1999

Docket99-920

StatusPublished

This text of 711 N.E.2d 1012 (Abbott v. Haight Properties, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Abbott v. Haight Properties, Inc., 711 N.E.2d 1012, 86 Ohio St. 3d 1417, 1999 Ohio LEXIS 2248 (Ohio 1999).

Pincite

Opinion

Lucas App. No. L-98-1413. On review of order certifying a conflict. The court determines that a conflict exists on the following question certified by the court of appeals in its Decision and Judgment Entry filed April 13,1999:

‘When, in a multi-defendant and/or multi-issue case, one defendant is granted summary judgment (or partial summary judgment on fewer than all the issues is granted) in a decision of the trial court which does not contain a Civ.R. 54(B) certification that there is no just reason for delay, and the remaining defendant(s) and/or issues are subsequently dismissed without prejudice, is the decision granting summary judgment dissolved or does it then become appealable?”

Resnick, J., not participating.

Saa sponte, cause held for the decision in 98-1935, Denham v. New Carlisle, Clark App. No. 98CA19; briefing schedule stayed.

Resnick, J., not participating.

The conflict case is Eiland v. Coldwell Banker Hunter Realty (1997), 122 Ohio App.3d 446, 702 N.E.2d 116.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lucas App. No. L-98-1413. On review of order certifying a conflict. The court determines that a conflict exists on the following question certified by the court of appeals in its Decision and Judgment Entry filed April 13,1999:

‘When, in a multi-defendant and/or multi-issue case, one defendant is granted summary judgment (or partial summary judgment on fewer than all the issues is granted) in a decision of the trial court which does not contain a Civ.R. 54(B) certification that there is no just reason for delay, and the remaining defendant(s) and/or issues are subsequently dismissed without prejudice, is the decision granting summary judgment dissolved or does it then become appealable?”

Resnick, J., not participating.

Saa sponte, cause held for the decision in 98-1935, Denham v. New Carlisle, Clark App. No. 98CA19; briefing schedule stayed.

Resnick, J., not participating.

The conflict case is Eiland v. Coldwell Banker Hunter Realty (1997), 122 Ohio App.3d 446, 702 N.E.2d 116.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

711 N.E.2d 1012, 86 Ohio St. 3d 1417, 1999 Ohio LEXIS 2248, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/abbott-v-haight-properties-inc-ohio-1999.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack