Abbott v. Guenther

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-1405

PAUL ABBOTT; ELAINE BARKER,

Plaintiffs - Appellants,

v.

DANIEL GUENTHER, Esquire,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Roger W. Titus, District Judge. (8:09- cv-02642-RWT)

Submitted: March 23, 2011 Decided: April 7, 2011

Before GREGORY and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Paul Abbott, Elaine Barker, Appellants Pro Se. Mark Patrick Johnson, ECCLESTON & WOLF PC, Hanover, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Paul Abbott and Elaine Barker appeal the district

court’s order granting Defendant’s motion for summary judgment.

We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court. Abbott v. Guenther, No. 8:09-cv-02642-RWT (D. Md. Mar.

10, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED