Abbott v. Guenther

Fourth Circuit

Abbott v. Guenther

421 F. App'x 312

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedApril 7, 2011

DocketNo. 10-1405

StatusPublished

This text of 421 F. App'x 312 (Abbott v. Guenther) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Abbott v. Guenther, 421 F. App'x 312 (4th Cir. 2011).

Pincite

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Paul Abbott and Elaine Barker appeal the district court’s order granting Defendant’s motion for summary judgment. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Abbott v. Guenther, No. 8:09-cv-02642-RWT (D.Md. Mar. 10, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Paul Abbott and Elaine Barker appeal the district court’s order granting Defendant’s motion for summary judgment. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Abbott v. Guenther, No. 8:09-cv-02642-RWT (D.Md. Mar. 10, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

421 F. App'x 312, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/abbott-v-guenther-ca4-2011.