Aaron v. Commissioner

Board of Tax Appeals

Aaron v. Commissioner

12 B.T.A. 556, 1928 BTA LEXIS 3504

United States Board of Tax Appeals·Decided June 13, 1928·No. Docket No. 13055.·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

[557] OPINION.

Siefkin:

The evidence shows that a net loss of $7,552.16 in trading in butter and eggs on the Chicago Mercantile Exchange was sustained in 1921 and to that extent the respondent was in error. The evidence with respect to cost of the automobile, its age, and the amount of depreciation sustained between the dates of purchase and sale, is so unsatisfactory that we approve the respondent’s action in that regard.

Judgment will be entered under Rule 50.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[557] OPINION.

Siefkin:

The evidence shows that a net loss of $7,552.16 in trading in butter and eggs on the Chicago Mercantile Exchange was sustained in 1921 and to that extent the respondent was in error. The evidence with respect to cost of the automobile, its age, and the amount of depreciation sustained between the dates of purchase and sale, is so unsatisfactory that we approve the respondent’s action in that regard.

Judgment will be entered under Rule 50.

Aaron v. Commissioner, 12 B.T.A. 556, 1928 BTA LEXIS 3504 (bta 1928).

Pincite

12 B.T.A. 556 (Aaron v. Commissioner) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related