A. W. Fenton Co. v. United States

60 Cust. Ct. 1043, 1968 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1850
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in A. W. Fenton Co. v. United States. Read the opinion of the Court — 55 Cust. Ct. 74
United States Customs Court·Decided May 22, 1968·No. No. P68/245; protests 61/4565, etc. (Cleveland)·Published

Opinion

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the items of merchandise marked “A” covered by the foregoing protests consist of articles in chief value of metal, having as an essential feature an electrical element or device, similar in all material respects to those the subject of The A. W. Fenton Co. v. United States (49 Cust. Ct. 242, Abstract 67085) or United States v. G. L. Electronics, Inc. (49 CCPA 111, C.A.D. 804), and that the items of merchandise marlied “B” covered by the foregoing protests consist of articles in chief value of metal, suitable for producing, rectifying, modifying, controlling, or distributing electrical energy, similar in all material respects to [1044]*1044those the subject of Abstract 67085 and C.A.D. 804, supra, the claims of the plaintiff were sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

A. W. Fenton Co. v. United States, 60 Cust. Ct. 1043, 1968 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1850 (cusc 1968).

60 Cust. Ct. 1043 (A. W. Fenton Co. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

A. W. Fenton Co. v. United States
49 Cust. Ct. 242 (U.S. Customs Court, 1962)