A. W. Fenton Co. v. United States
36 Cust. Ct. 395
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in A. W. Fenton Co. v. United States. Read the opinion of the Court — 34 Cust. Ct. 202 →
United States Customs Court·Decided April 5, 1956·No. No. 59827; protests 258872-K, etc. (Cleveland)·Published
Opinion
Opinion by
In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of beef similar in all material respects to that the subject of Swift & Company et al. v. United States (33 Cust. Ct. 212, C. D. 1655), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
A. W. Fenton Co. v. United States, 36 Cust. Ct. 395 (cusc 1956).
36 Cust. Ct. 395 (A. W. Fenton Co. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Swift & Co. v. United States
33 Cust. Ct. 212 (U.S. Customs Court, 1954)