A. W. Fenton Co. v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

A. W. Fenton Co. v. United States

36 Cust. Ct. 445

United States Customs Court·Decided May 24, 1956·No. No. 59948; protest 257902-K (New York)·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Opinion by

Donlon, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of one antique violin and violoncello made “prior to the year 1801” and that if the letter from the importer, which is now attached to the entry, had been before the collector prior to the liquidation of the entry or the expiration of the collector’s review period under section 515, the merchandise would have been liquidated free of duty under paragraph 1811, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Donlon, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of one antique violin and violoncello made “prior to the year 1801” and that if the letter from the importer, which is now attached to the entry, had been before the collector prior to the liquidation of the entry or the expiration of the collector’s review period under section 515, the merchandise would have been liquidated free of duty under paragraph 1811, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.

A. W. Fenton Co. v. United States, 36 Cust. Ct. 445 (cusc 1956).

Pincite

36 Cust. Ct. 445 (A. W. Fenton Co. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related