A. R. Fuels, Inc. v. City of New York

402 N.E.2d 1166, 49 N.Y.2d 749, 426 N.Y.S.2d 265, 1980 N.Y. LEXIS 2114
New York Court of Appeals·Decided February 7, 1980·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.

Nothing in the wording of section 105 of the General Municipal Law proscribes the city’s acceptance of a condition permitting withdrawal of a bid after less than 45 days, nor has the city pointed to any legislative history so suggesting. Having so provided in its standard form of contract for some 30 years, the city can, as to future contracts, obviate any problem by amending its contract form. It cannot, however, impose such a change retroactively on plaintiff by contorting the words of the statute.

Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Meyer concur in memorandum.

Order affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

A. R. Fuels, Inc. v. City of New York, 402 N.E.2d 1166, 49 N.Y.2d 749, 426 N.Y.S.2d 265, 1980 N.Y. LEXIS 2114 (N.Y. 1980).

402 N.E.2d 1166 (A. R. Fuels, Inc. v. City of New York) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

County of Suffolk v. United States
26 Cl. Ct. 924 (Court of Claims, 1992)
A. R. Fuels, Inc. v. City of New York
469 N.E.2d 524 (New York Court of Appeals, 1984)
A. R. Fuels, Inc. v. City of New York
83 A.D.2d 510 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1981)