A. Capobianco & Sons Contracting Corp. v. State

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

A. Capobianco & Sons Contracting Corp. v. State

223 A.D.2d 700, 637 N.Y.S.2d 938, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 668

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 29, 1996

StatusPublished

This text of 223 A.D.2d 700 (A. Capobianco & Sons Contracting Corp. v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

A. Capobianco & Sons Contracting Corp. v. State, 223 A.D.2d 700, 637 N.Y.S.2d 938, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 668 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1996).

Pincite

Opinion

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the Appeals Board of the New York State Department of Motor Vehicles, dated January 31, 1994, which sustained the determination of an Administrative Law Judge, [701]*701made after a hearing, finding the petitioner guilty of violating Vehicle and Traffic Law § 385, and imposing a fine.

Adjudged that the determination is confirmed and the proceeding is dismissed on the merits, with costs.

The Administrative Law Judge imposed the appropriate fine upon the petitioner for operating a vehicle whose weight exceeded the amount permitted by its overweight permit (see, Vehicle and Traffic Law § 385 [19] [d]). Balletta, J. P., O’Brien, Ritter, Pizzuto and Altman, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the Appeals Board of the New York State Department of Motor Vehicles, dated January 31, 1994, which sustained the determination of an Administrative Law Judge, [701]*701made after a hearing, finding the petitioner guilty of violating Vehicle and Traffic Law § 385, and imposing a fine.

Adjudged that the determination is confirmed and the proceeding is dismissed on the merits, with costs.

The Administrative Law Judge imposed the appropriate fine upon the petitioner for operating a vehicle whose weight exceeded the amount permitted by its overweight permit (see, Vehicle and Traffic Law § 385 [19] [d]). Balletta, J. P., O’Brien, Ritter, Pizzuto and Altman, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

223 A.D.2d 700, 637 N.Y.S.2d 938, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 668, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/a-capobianco-sons-contracting-corp-v-state-nyappdiv-1996.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack