A. Bourjois & Co. v. Aldridge
263 U.S. 675, 44 S. Ct. 4, 68 L. Ed. 501, 1923 U.S. LEXIS 2840
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedOctober 8, 1923
DocketNo. 50
StatusPublished
Cited by21 cases
This text of 263 U.S. 675 (A. Bourjois & Co. v. Aldridge) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
A. Bourjois & Co. v. Aldridge, 263 U.S. 675, 44 S. Ct. 4, 68 L. Ed. 501, 1923 U.S. LEXIS 2840 (1923).
Opinion
The two.quéstions certified by the Circuit Court of Appeals’“for Second Circuit are answered in the affirmative, upon the authority of Bourjois & Co. v. Katzel, 260 U. S. 689, the defendant not objecting.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Montblanc-Simplo GMBH v. Staples, Inc.
172 F. Supp. 2d 231 (D. Massachusetts, 2001)
United States v. Eighty-Three Rolex Watches v. Sam's Wholesale Club and Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., Claimants-Appellants
992 F.2d 508 (Fifth Circuit, 1993)
Lever Brothers Company v. United States of America
981 F.2d 1330 (D.C. Circuit, 1993)
Societe Des Produits Nestle, S.A. v. Casa Helvetia, Inc.
982 F.2d 633 (First Circuit, 1992)
Weil Ceramics And Glass, Inc. v. Bernard Dash
878 F.2d 659 (Third Circuit, 1989)
Lever Brothers Co. v. United States of America
877 F.2d 101 (D.C. Circuit, 1989)
Weil Ceramics & Glass, Inc. v. Dash
878 F.2d 659 (Third Circuit, 1989)
Lever Bros. Co. v. United States
652 F. Supp. 403 (District of Columbia, 1987)
United States v. Eighty-Nine (89) Bottles of "Eau de Joy"
797 F.2d 767 (Ninth Circuit, 1986)
United States v. Eighty-Nine Bottles of Eau De Joy
797 F.2d 767 (Ninth Circuit, 1986)
Olympus Corporation v. United States, K Mart Corporation, Intervenor-Appellee, 47th Street Photo, Inc., Intervenor-Appellee
792 F.2d 315 (Second Circuit, 1986)
Coalition to Preserve the Integrity of American Trademarks v. United States of America
790 F.2d 903 (D.C. Circuit, 1986)
Weil Ceramics & Glass, Inc. v. Dash
618 F. Supp. 700 (D. New Jersey, 1985)
Olympus Corp. v. United States
627 F. Supp. 911 (E.D. New York, 1985)
Vivitar Corporation v. The United States, and 47th Street Photo, Inc., Intervenor
761 F.2d 1552 (Federal Circuit, 1985)
Coalition to Preserve the Integrity of American Trademarks v. United States
598 F. Supp. 844 (District of Columbia, 1984)
Vivitar Corp. v. United States
593 F. Supp. 420 (Court of International Trade, 1984)
Bell & Howell : Mamiya Co. v. Masel Supply Co.
548 F. Supp. 1063 (E.D. New York, 1982)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
263 U.S. 675, 44 S. Ct. 4, 68 L. Ed. 501, 1923 U.S. LEXIS 2840, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/a-bourjois-co-v-aldridge-scotus-1923.