75 St. Servicing LLC v. CLST Enters. LLC

2023 NY Slip Op 05441
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedOctober 26, 2023
DocketIndex No. 850001/21 Appeal No. 914 Case No. 2022-04757
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 2023 NY Slip Op 05441 (75 St. Servicing LLC v. CLST Enters. LLC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
75 St. Servicing LLC v. CLST Enters. LLC, 2023 NY Slip Op 05441 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2023).

Opinion

75 St. Servicing LLC v CLST Enters. LLC (2023 NY Slip Op 05441)
75 St. Servicing LLC v CLST Enters. LLC
2023 NY Slip Op 05441
Decided on October 26, 2023
Appellate Division, First Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided and Entered: October 26, 2023
Before: Webber, J.P., Moulton, González, Kennedy, JJ.

Index No. 850001/21 Appeal No. 914 Case No. 2022-04757

[*1]75 Street Servicing LLC, Plaintiff-Respondent,

v

CLST Enterprises LLC, et al., Defendants-Appellants, "John Doe #1," et al., Defendants.


Law Office of Jason S. Matuskiewicz, Brooklyn (Law Office of Jason S. Matuskiewicz of counsel), for appellants.

Glenn Rodney, P.C., Wallkill (Glenn Rodney of counsel), for respondent.



Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Francis A. Kahn III, J.), entered May 4, 2022, which granted plaintiff's motion for summary judgment on its foreclosure complaint and an order of reference, and dismissed defendants' affirmative defenses, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Based on the nonwaiver provision of the note and mortgage, the acceptance of monthly payments by plaintiff's predecessor in interest, Sterling National Bank, following the July 1, 2019 maturity date of its loan to defendant CLST Enterprises LLC, did not constitute a waiver of the contractual conditions for extending the loan beyond the maturity date (see Flushing Unique Homes, LLC v Brooklyn Fed. Sav. Bank, 100 AD3d 956 [2d Dept 2012]; see generally Rosenzweig v Givens, 62 AD3d 1, 7 [1st Dept 2009], affd 13 NY3d 774 [2009]). CLST did not otherwise establish that it satisfied those contractual conditions.

We have considered defendants' remaining arguments and find them unavailing.

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.

ENTERED: October 26, 2023



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

75 St. Servicing LLC v. CLST Enters. LLC
2023 NY Slip Op 05441 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2023)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2023 NY Slip Op 05441, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/75-st-servicing-llc-v-clst-enters-llc-nyappdiv-2023.