400 East Bay Street, LLC, a Virginia etc. v. The Plaza Condominium Association etc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

400 East Bay Street, LLC, a Virginia etc. v. The Plaza Condominium Association etc.

181 So. 3d 547, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 17933, 2015 WL 7731437

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedDecember 1, 2015

Docket1D14-5553

StatusPublished

This text of 181 So. 3d 547 (400 East Bay Street, LLC, a Virginia etc. v. The Plaza Condominium Association etc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

400 East Bay Street, LLC, a Virginia etc. v. The Plaza Condominium Association etc., 181 So. 3d 547, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 17933, 2015 WL 7731437 (Fla. Ct. App. 2015).

Pincite

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

In this second-tier certiorari action, condominium owners 400 East Bay Street, LLC., and C.uthrell & Kloeppel Properties, LLC., (collectively the .Owners) filed a petition for writ of certiorari in this -Court, claiming error by the circuit judge acting in his appellate capacity. In order to be granted relief in second-tier certiorari, the petitioners/Owners must show that .the circuit court did not afford procedural due process and did not observe the essential requirements of law. See Haines City Cmty. Dev. v. Heggs, 658 So.2d 523, 530 (Fla.1995); State v. Bolware, 999 So.2d 660, 661 (Fla. 1st DCA 2003). Certiorari review of a circuit court’s appellate decision is narrow and must not be utilized as a means of obtaining a second appeal. Heggs, 658 So.2d at 529 (quoting Combs v. State, 436 So.2d 93, 95-96 (Fla.1983)). The Florida Supreme Court has recently reiterated, in no uncertain terms, that second-tier certiorari review is to be granted on a very limited basis. Florida Parole Comm’n v. Taylor, 132 So.3d 780 (Fla.2014). That is, a grant of second-tier cer-tiorari review requires “a departure from the essential requirement of law resulting in a miscarriage of justice.” Id. at 783 (citation omitted).

We find that the circuit court afforded the Owners due process and did not depart from the essential requirements of law in reviewing the decision of the county court. Therefore, the standards for second-tier certiorari are not met here.

DENIED.

SWANSON and BILBREY, JJ., concur. MAKAR, J., Concurs With Written Opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

In this second-tier certiorari action, condominium owners 400 East Bay Street, LLC., and C.uthrell & Kloeppel Properties, LLC., (collectively the .Owners) filed a petition for writ of certiorari in this -Court, claiming error by the circuit judge acting in his appellate capacity. In order to be granted relief in second-tier certiorari, the petitioners/Owners must show that .the circuit court did not afford procedural due process and did not observe the essential requirements of law. See Haines City Cmty. Dev. v. Heggs, 658 So.2d 523, 530 (Fla.1995); State v. Bolware, 999 So.2d 660, 661 (Fla. 1st DCA 2003). Certiorari review of a circuit court’s appellate decision is narrow and must not be utilized as a means of obtaining a second appeal. Heggs, 658 So.2d at 529 (quoting Combs v. State, 436 So.2d 93, 95-96 (Fla.1983)). The Florida Supreme Court has recently reiterated, in no uncertain terms, that second-tier certiorari review is to be granted on a very limited basis. Florida Parole Comm’n v. Taylor, 132 So.3d 780 (Fla.2014). That is, a grant of second-tier cer-tiorari review requires “a departure from the essential requirement of law resulting in a miscarriage of justice.” Id. at 783 (citation omitted).

We find that the circuit court afforded the Owners due process and did not depart from the essential requirements of law in reviewing the decision of the county court. Therefore, the standards for second-tier certiorari are not met here.

DENIED.

SWANSON and BILBREY, JJ., concur. MAKAR, J., Concurs With Written Opinion.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

181 So. 3d 547, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 17933, 2015 WL 7731437, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/400-east-bay-street-llc-a-virginia-etc-v-the-plaza-condominium-fladistctapp-2015.

Opinions

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack