324 Liquor Corp. v. McLaughlin
507 N.E.2d 1087, 69 N.Y.2d 891, 515 N.Y.S.2d 231, 1987 N.Y. LEXIS 16278
This text of 507 N.E.2d 1087 (324 Liquor Corp. v. McLaughlin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
324 Liquor Corp. v. McLaughlin, 507 N.E.2d 1087, 69 N.Y.2d 891, 515 N.Y.S.2d 231, 1987 N.Y. LEXIS 16278 (N.Y. 1987).
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
On reargument, following remand by the Supreme Court of the United States, order affirmed, with costs (324 Liq. Corp. v Duffy, 479 US —, 107 S Ct 720).
Concur: Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Simons, Kaye, Titone, Hancock, Jr., and Bellacosa. Taking no part: Judge Alexander.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
324 Liquor Corp. v. Duffy
479 U.S. 335 (Supreme Court, 1987)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
507 N.E.2d 1087, 69 N.Y.2d 891, 515 N.Y.S.2d 231, 1987 N.Y. LEXIS 16278, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/324-liquor-corp-v-mclaughlin-ny-1987.