27 Fair empl.prac.cas. 1073, 28 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 32,407 Michael E. Spiess, Jack K. Hardy and Benjamin F. Rountree, Plaintiffs v. C. Itoh & Company (America), Inc.

664 F.2d 480
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedDecember 9, 1981
Docket79-2382
StatusPublished

This text of 664 F.2d 480 (27 Fair empl.prac.cas. 1073, 28 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 32,407 Michael E. Spiess, Jack K. Hardy and Benjamin F. Rountree, Plaintiffs v. C. Itoh & Company (America), Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
27 Fair empl.prac.cas. 1073, 28 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 32,407 Michael E. Spiess, Jack K. Hardy and Benjamin F. Rountree, Plaintiffs v. C. Itoh & Company (America), Inc., 664 F.2d 480 (5th Cir. 1981).

Opinion

664 F.2d 480

27 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. 1073,
28 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 32,407
Michael E. SPIESS, Jack K. Hardy and Benjamin F. Rountree,
Plaintiffs- Appellees,
v.
C. ITOH & COMPANY (AMERICA), INC., Defendant-Appellant.

No. 79-2382.

United States Court of Appeals,
Fifth Circuit.

Unit A*

Dec. 9, 1981.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas, 469 F.Supp. 1; Carl O. Bue, Jr., Judge.

Fulbright & Jaworski, Joe P. Martin, Neil Martin, Nancy Morrison O'Connor, Houston, Tex., for defendant-appellant.

Porter & Clements, Edward John O'Neill, Jr., Charles E. Humphrey, Jr., Houston, Tex., for plaintiffs-appellees.

Lutz Alexander Prager, E.E.O.C., Washington, D. C., for amicus curiae.

Before BROWN, AINSWORTH**, CHARLES CLARK, GEE, RUBIN, GARZA, REAVLEY, POLITZ, RANDALL, TATE, SAM D. JOHNSON, WILLIAMS and GARWOOD, Circuit Judges.

BY THE COURT:

In light of the grant of certiorari by the Supreme Court of the United States in Avigliano v. Sumitomo Shoji America, Inc., --- U.S. ----, 102 S.Ct. ----, 70 L.Ed.2d ---, No. 81-24, and Sumitomo Shoji America, Inc. v. Avigliano, --- U.S. ----, 102 S.Ct. ----, 70 L.Ed.2d ---, No. 80-2070, it is ordered that the order of this court requiring the above styled cause to be reheard en banc, 654 F.2d 302, is vacated and the opinion of the panel dated the 24th day of April, 1981, 643 F.2d 353, is reinstated.

*

Former Fifth Circuit case, Section 9(1) of Public Law 96-452-October 14, 1980

**

Because of illness, Judge Ainsworth did not participate in the consideration of this order

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Spiess v. C. Itoh & Co.(America), Inc.
469 F. Supp. 1 (S.D. Texas, 1979)
Spiess v. C. Itoh & Co. (AMERICA), Inc.
664 F.2d 480 (Fifth Circuit, 1981)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
664 F.2d 480, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/27-fair-emplpraccas-1073-28-empl-prac-dec-p-32407-michael-e-ca5-1981.