200311-69370

CourtBoard of Veterans' Appeals
DecidedJanuary 29, 2021
Docket200311-69370
StatusUnpublished

This text of 200311-69370 (200311-69370) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Board of Veterans' Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
200311-69370, (bva 2021).

Opinion

Citation Nr: AXXXXXXXX Decision Date: 01/29/21 Archive Date: 01/29/21

DOCKET NO. 200311-69370 DATE: January 29, 2021

ORDER

Service connection for sleep apnea is granted.

FINDING OF FACT

The Veteran’s sleep apnea had its onset during service or is otherwise related to service.

CONCLUSION OF LAW

The criteria for service connection for sleep apnea have been met. 38 U.S.C. §§ 1110, 1131, 5103, 5103A, 5107; 38 C.F.R. §§ 3.159, 3.303, 3.304, 3.310.

REASONS AND BASES FOR FINDING AND CONCLUSION

The Veteran served on active duty in the Navy from January 1990 to March 1992.

In an April 2018 rating decision, the agency of original jurisdiction (AOJ) denied service connection for sleep apnea. In January 2019, the Veteran submitted a Rapid Appeals Modernization Program (RAMP) opt-in election form and requested higher level review of the evidence. The AOJ considered the evidence of record as of the date VA received the RAMP election form and issued the rating decision on appeal in March 2019, which again denied service connection for sleep apnea. In March 2020, the Veteran timely appealed and requested direct review of the evidence considered by the AOJ. Under direct review, the Board may only consider the evidence of record as of the date of the RAMP election.

Service Connection

Under the relevant laws and regulations, service connection may be granted for a disability resulting from disease or injury incurred in or aggravated by active service. 38 U.S.C. §§ 1110, 1131. Generally, the evidence must show the existence of (1) a present disability; (2) in-service incurrence or aggravation of a disease or injury; and (3) a causal relationship between the present disability and the disease or injury incurred or aggravated during service. Shedden v. Principi, 381 F.3d 1163, 1166-67 (Fed. Cir. 2004). A disability may also be found service connected on a secondary basis by demonstrating that the disability is either (1) proximately due to or the result of an already service-connected disease or injury or (2) aggravated by an already service-connected disease or injury. Allen v. Brown, 7 Vet. App. 439, 448 (1995); 38 C.F.R. § 3.310.

Additionally, VAOPGCPREC 1-2017 recognizes that, although obesity itself may not be service-connected, obesity may act as an “intermediate step” between a service-connected disability and a current disability that may be service-connected on a secondary basis under 38 C.F.R. § 3.310.

Sleep Apnea

The Board has reviewed the evidence of record and finds that service connection is warranted for the Veteran’s sleep apnea.

First, the Board notes that the Veteran’s available service treatment records (STRs) do not exhibit complaints, treatment, or evidence of sleep apnea. During his April 1989 entrance examination and February 1990 periodic examination, there are also no indications of sleep apnea. Additionally, the Board notes that the Veteran’s complete STRs, including his separation examination, are unavailable. Accordingly, the Board has a heightened obligation to explain its findings, to evaluate any evidence that may be favorable to the Veteran, and to provide an adequate rationale for rejecting any evidence. Washington v. Nicholson, 19 Vet. App. 362, 371 (2005).

In November 2017, the Veteran submitted a statement regarding his claim of service connection for sleep apnea. The Veteran asserted that his service-connected psychiatric disability, including PTSD and depressive disorder, and his service-connected right ankle disability, caused progressive weight gain, which caused or contributed to his sleep apnea. Specifically, the Veteran stated that his psychiatric symptoms and fatigue caused the development of poor eating habits, less motivation to exercise, and less ability to exercise, which lead to progressive weight gain both during service and following separation from service. The Veteran asserted that the progressive weight gain caused by his service-connected disabilities caused or contributed to his sleep apnea.

In support of his assertions, the Veteran submitted private medical records and a sleep apnea disability and benefits questionnaire (DBQ) accompanied by medical opinion from a private medical provider in November 2017. First, the private medical records indicate that the Veteran underwent sleep studies in June 2015 and August 2015, was diagnosed as having sleep apnea, and was prescribed CPAP therapy. In the November 2017 DBQ, the private medical provider noted that the Veteran gained a significant amount of weight due to his service-connected depressive disorder and PTSD and that subsequently he developed pauses in his breathing while sleeping, snoring, nightmares, frequent awakenings, and daytime sleepiness. The medical provider reviewed the chronology of the Veteran’s weight gain and found that it demonstrated progressive weight gain. The medical provider opined that it is at least as likely as not that the Veteran’s sleep apnea is secondary, related to, and/or aggravated by his service-connected psychiatric disability, including PTSD and depressive disorder, and his service-connected right ankle disability. In the rationale, the medical provider found a known association between psychiatric disabilities, including PTSD and depressive disorder, and weight gain and obesity, and the provider also found a known association between musculoskeletal conditions, such as the Veteran’s ankle disability, and weight gain and obesity. The examiner also stated that there is a pathophysiological link between sleep apnea and obesity due to reductions in the functional residual capacity of the anatomy of the upper airway caused by fat deposition.

Next, the in March 2018 the Veteran underwent an in-person VA examination with claims file review regarding sleep apnea. The examiner noted that the Veteran was diagnosed as having sleep apnea following a sleep study in June 2015. The examiner found that at the time of the Veteran’s sleep study his body mass index (BMI) was 28. The examiner noted that a BMI of less than 30 is classified as overweight and a BMI of 30 or greater is classified as obese. The examiner found that the medical records since 2009 indicated a minimal fluctuation of the Veteran’s weight with a BMI between 28 to 30. The examiner opined that it is less likely than not that that the Veteran’s service-connected psychiatric disability, including depressive disorder and PTSD, caused the Veteran to become obese. In the rationale, the examiner stated that although obesity or progressive wight gain prior to a diagnosis of sleep apnea are considered the strongest risk factors for the development of sleep apnea, the evidence of record does not indicate that the Veteran has persistent obesity or progressive weight gain prior to his sleep apnea diagnosis. Further, the examiner determined that the medical records demonstrate scarce or lacking objective evidence to indicate the presence of chronic or worsening ankle pain, depressive symptoms, anxiety symptoms, or increased appetite, which would contribute to weight gain.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

JAMES A. W ASHINGTON v. R. James Nicholson
19 Vet. App. 362 (Veterans Claims, 2005)
Allen v. Brown
7 Vet. App. 439 (Veterans Claims, 1995)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
200311-69370, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/200311-69370-bva-2021.