1410 Lexington Avenue LLC v. Michele Iuliano and Anisa Iuliano

S.D. New York

1410 Lexington Avenue LLC v. Michele Iuliano and Anisa Iuliano

DecidedOctober 21, 2025

Docket1:25-cv-06179

StatusUnknown

This text of 1410 Lexington Avenue LLC v. Michele Iuliano and Anisa Iuliano (1410 Lexington Avenue LLC v. Michele Iuliano and Anisa Iuliano) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

1410 Lexington Avenue LLC v. Michele Iuliano and Anisa Iuliano, (S.D.N.Y. 2025).

Pincite

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK 1410 LEXINGTON AVENUE LLC, Plaintiff, 25 Civ. 6179 (KPF) -v.- ORDER MICHELE IULIANO and ANISA IULIANO, Defendants. KATHERINE POLK FAILLA, District Judge: On August 11, 2025, the Court scheduled an initial pretrial conference in this matter for October 23, 2025, which is two days from now. (See Dkt. #8). The Court further ordered the parties to submit a proposed Case Management Plan and joint letter by last Thursday, October 16, 2025. (Id.). But, to date, the parties have not done so. Indeed, Defendants have not even appeared in this case. On October 17, 2025, the Court emailed counsel of record for Plaintiff to inquire about the status of the required documents. The Court also asked whether Plaintiff had been in contact with Defendants and, if not, encouraged Plaintiff to request an adjournment of the initial pretrial conference and to follow the default judgment procedure outlined in the Court’s Individual Rules of Practice in Civil Cases. Counsel for Plaintiff has not responded to the Court’s email. Today, October 21, 2025, the Court called counsel for Plaintiff at the phone number listed on the docket but discovered that it is a wrong number: someone other than counsel, and unaffiliated with counsel’s law firm, answered. Accordingly, Plaintiff is ORDERED to file a letter with the Court by October 30, 2025, explaining the next steps it envisions for this case. The Court warns Plaintiff that failure to follow this Order — and continued failure

to engage with this case — may lead the court to consider dismissal for failure to prosecute. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b); see also LeSane v. Hall’s Sec. Analyst, Inc., 239 F.3d 206, 209 (2d Cir. 2001) (Rule 41(b) “gives the district court authority to dismiss a plaintiff’s case sua sponte for failure to prosecute.”). SO ORDERED. Dated: October 21, 2025 New York, New York

KATHERINE POLK FAILLA United States District Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK 1410 LEXINGTON AVENUE LLC, Plaintiff, 25 Civ. 6179 (KPF) -v.- ORDER MICHELE IULIANO and ANISA IULIANO, Defendants. KATHERINE POLK FAILLA, District Judge: On August 11, 2025, the Court scheduled an initial pretrial conference in this matter for October 23, 2025, which is two days from now. (See Dkt. #8). The Court further ordered the parties to submit a proposed Case Management Plan and joint letter by last Thursday, October 16, 2025. (Id.). But, to date, the parties have not done so. Indeed, Defendants have not even appeared in this case. On October 17, 2025, the Court emailed counsel of record for Plaintiff to inquire about the status of the required documents. The Court also asked whether Plaintiff had been in contact with Defendants and, if not, encouraged Plaintiff to request an adjournment of the initial pretrial conference and to follow the default judgment procedure outlined in the Court’s Individual Rules of Practice in Civil Cases. Counsel for Plaintiff has not responded to the Court’s email. Today, October 21, 2025, the Court called counsel for Plaintiff at the phone number listed on the docket but discovered that it is a wrong number: someone other than counsel, and unaffiliated with counsel’s law firm, answered. Accordingly, Plaintiff is ORDERED to file a letter with the Court by October 30, 2025, explaining the next steps it envisions for this case. The Court warns Plaintiff that failure to follow this Order — and continued failure

to engage with this case — may lead the court to consider dismissal for failure to prosecute. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b); see also LeSane v. Hall’s Sec. Analyst, Inc., 239 F.3d 206, 209 (2d Cir. 2001) (Rule 41(b) “gives the district court authority to dismiss a plaintiff’s case sua sponte for failure to prosecute.”). SO ORDERED. Dated: October 21, 2025 New York, New York

KATHERINE POLK FAILLA United States District Judge

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1410 Lexington Avenue LLC v. Michele Iuliano and Anisa Iuliano, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/1410-lexington-avenue-llc-v-michele-iuliano-and-anisa-iuliano-nysd-2025.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack