125 E. 50th St. v. Credo Intl. Inc.

75 Misc. 3d 134(A), 2022 NY Slip Op 50504(U)
CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
DecidedJune 17, 2022
Docket570145/21
StatusUnpublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 75 Misc. 3d 134(A) (125 E. 50th St. v. Credo Intl. Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
125 E. 50th St. v. Credo Intl. Inc., 75 Misc. 3d 134(A), 2022 NY Slip Op 50504(U) (N.Y. Ct. App. 2022).

Opinion

125 E. 50th St. v Credo Intl. Inc. (2022 NY Slip Op 50504(U)) [*1]

125 E. 50th St. v Credo Intl. Inc.
2022 NY Slip Op 50504(U) [75 Misc 3d 134(A)]
Decided on June 17, 2022
Appellate Term, First Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and will not be published in the printed Official Reports.


Decided on June 17, 2022
SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE TERM, FIRST DEPARTMENT
PRESENT: Hagler, J.P., Tisch, Michael, JJ.
570145/21

125 East 50th Street, Co., Lessee, LLC, Petitioner-Landlord-Appellant,

against

Credo International Inc., Respondent-Tenant-Respondent.


Landlord appeals from an order of the Civil Court of the City of New York, New York County (Sabrina B. Kraus, J.), entered October 14, 2021, which denied its motion for an order deeming its affidavit of service filed timely nunc pro tunc in a commercial nonpayment summary proceeding.

Per Curiam.

Order (Sabrina B. Kraus, J.), entered October 14, 2021, affirmed, without costs.

Landlord's contentions on this appeal are, for the most part, unpreserved for appellate review and, in any event, without merit. Landlord's failure to timely file proof of service of the notice of petition and petition (see RPAPL 735[2][b]) deprived the court of jurisdiction (see Riverside Syndicate, Inc. v Saltzman, 49 AD3d 402 [2008]; Berkeley Assoc. Co. v Di Nolfi, 122 AD2d 703, 705 [1986], lv dismissed 69 NY2d 804 [1987]). In the circumstances, Civil Court properly denied landlord's motion for an order deeming the affidavit of service timely filed nunc pro tunc.

We have considered landlord's remaining arguments and find them unpersuasive (see Brash v Richards, 195 AD3d 582 [2021]).

All concur

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE COURT.

Clerk of the Court
Decision Date: June 17, 2022

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Sun Star Props. Am., LLC v. Meridius
2025 NY Slip Op 31388(U) (NYC Civil Court, New York, 2025)
Ash Ave LLC v. Wilder
2024 NY Slip Op 51384(U) (NYC Civil Court, Queens, 2024)
Nardeo v. Diaz
2024 NY Slip Op 24028 (NYC Civil Court, Bronx, 2024)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
75 Misc. 3d 134(A), 2022 NY Slip Op 50504(U), Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/125-e-50th-st-v-credo-intl-inc-nyappterm-2022.