09-24 488

CourtBoard of Veterans' Appeals
DecidedApril 26, 2018
Docket09-24 488
StatusUnpublished

This text of 09-24 488 (09-24 488) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Board of Veterans' Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
09-24 488, (bva 2018).

Opinion

Citation Nr: 1826241 Decision Date: 04/26/18 Archive Date: 05/07/18

DOCKET NO. 09-24 488 ) DATE ) )

On appeal from the Department of Veterans Affairs Regional Office in Nashville, Tennessee

THE ISSUES

1. Entitlement to service connection for a lumbar spine disorder, identified as degenerative disc disease and intervertebral disc syndrome, claimed as a back injury.

2. Entitlement to service connection for a gastrointestinal disorder other than irritable bowel syndrome (IBS), previously identified as hiatal hernia and gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), to include as qualifying as an undiagnosed illness as a result of service in Southwest Asia.

REPRESENTATION

The Veteran represented by: Tennessee Department of Veterans' Affairs

WITNESS AT HEARING ON APPEAL

The Veteran ATTORNEY FOR THE BOARD

Jeanne Celtnieks, Associate Counsel

INTRODUCTION

The Veteran served on active duty from June 1988 to April 1992.

This matter is before the Board of Veterans' Appeals (Board) on appeal of a February 2008 rating decision of a Regional Office (RO) of the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA). A hearing was held before the undersigned in March 2011.

The Board previously remanded these issues for additional development in March 2013, October 2014, February 2016, and June 2017.

FINDINGS OF FACT

1. A February 2018 rating decision granted service connection for a lumbar spine disability, identified as degenerative disc disease and intervertebral disc syndrome and claimed as a back injury.

2. The Veteran's gastrointestinal disability, other than irritable bowel syndrome, constitutes a medically undiagnosed illness that is presumptively the result of service in Southwest Asia.

CONCLUSIONS OF LAW

1. The criteria for dismissal of an appeal due to lack of jurisdiction have been met with respect to the issues of service connection for a lumbar spine disability, identified as degenerative disc disease and intervertebral disc syndrome and claimed as a back injury. 38 U.S.C. § 7105(d)(5) (2012); 38 C.F.R. § 20.202 (2017).

2. The criteria for service connection for an undiagnosed gastrointestinal illness have been met. 38 U.S.C. §§ 1110, 1117, 1118, 5107 (2012); 38 C.F.R. §§ 3.102 , 3.303, 3.304, 3.317 (2017).

REASONS AND BASES FOR FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS

Lumbar Spine Disability

The Board may dismiss any appeal which fails to allege specific error of fact or law in the determination being appealed. 38 U.S.C. § 7105(d)(5); 38 C.F.R. § 20.202.

A September 2016 rating decision granted service connection a lumbar spine disability, identified as degenerative disc disease and intervertebral disc syndrome and claimed as a back injury. Thus, the benefits sought on appeal have been granted in full, and there is no remaining allegation of error of fact or law for appellate consideration with respect to the issue of service connection for a lumbar spine disability. Therefore, the Board has no jurisdiction to review the appeal of this issue, and it is dismissed. Id.

This decision is intended to complete the record with respect to the issues of service connection for lumbar spine disability identified as degenerative disc disease and intervertebral disc syndrome and claimed as a back injury, as the issue was not removed from Veterans Appeals Control and Locator System (VACOLS) by the agency of original jurisdiction (AOJ) prior to recertification of this matter to the Board.

Gastrointestinal Disorder

Generally, service connection may be granted for a disability resulting from disease or injury incurred in or aggravated by service. 38 U.S.C. §§ 1110, 1131. Establishing service connection generally requires evidence of (1) a current disability; (2) an in-service incurrence or aggravation of a disease or injury; and (3) a nexus between the claimed in-service disease or injury and the current disability. Shedden v. Principi, 381 F.3d 1163, 1167 (Fed. Cir. 2004).

Under 38 U.S.C. § 1117(a)(1), compensation is warranted for a Persian Gulf veteran who exhibits objective indications of a "qualifying chronic disability" that became manifest during service on active duty in the Armed Forces in the Southwest Asia theater of operations during the Persian Gulf War, or to a degree of 10 percent not later than December 31, 2021. Furthermore, the chronic disability must not be attributed to any known clinical disease by history, physical examination, or laboratory tests. See 38 U.S.C. § 1117; 38 C.F.R. § 3.317(a), (b).

A Persian Gulf veteran is defined as a veteran who served on active duty in the Armed Forces in the Southwest Asia theater of operations during the Persian Gulf War. See 38 U.S.C. § 1117(f); 38 C.F.R. § 3.317(e).

A "qualifying chronic disability" includes an undiagnosed illness. See 38 C.F.R. § 3.317(a)(2). The term "objective indications of a qualifying chronic disability" include both "signs," in a medical sense of objective evidence perceptible to an examining physician, and other, non-medical indicators that are capable of independent verification. See 38 C.F.R. § 3.317(a)(3).

Signs or symptoms that may be manifestations of undiagnosed illness or a chronic multi-symptom illness include the following: fatigue, unexplained rashes or other dermatological signs or symptoms, headache, muscle pain, joint pain, neurological signs or symptoms, neuropsychological signs or symptoms, signs or symptoms involving the upper or lower respiratory system, sleep disturbances, gastrointestinal signs or symptoms, cardiovascular signs or symptoms, abnormal weight loss, or menstrual disorders. See 38 U.S.C. § 1117(g); 38 C.F.R. § 3.317(b).

With claims for service connection for a qualifying chronic disability under 38 C.F.R. § 3.317, the veteran is not required to provide competent evidence linking a current disability to an event during service. Gutierrez v. Principi, 19 Vet. App. 1, 8-9 (2004). Lay persons are competent to report objective signs of illness. Id. at 9-10.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

James P. G Utierrez v. Anthony J. Principi
19 Vet. App. 1 (Veterans Claims, 2004)
Michael A. Stankevich v. R. James Nicholson
19 Vet. App. 470 (Veterans Claims, 2006)
Gilbert v. Derwinski
1 Vet. App. 49 (Veterans Claims, 1990)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
09-24 488, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/09-24-488-bva-2018.