Oregon Constitution

Article XV, § 10 — The Oregon Property Protection Act of 2000

Oregon Const. art. XV, § 10

This text of Oregon Const. art. XV, § 10 (The Oregon Property Protection Act of 2000) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

JurisdictionOregonDocumentConstitution
ArticleXV
Section§ 10
CitationOregon Const. art. XV, § 10
Bluebook
Or. Const. art. XV, § 10.

Full Text

(1) This section may be known and shall be cited as the "Oregon Property Protection Act of 2000." (2) Statement of principles. The People, in the exercise of the power reserved to them under the Constitution of the State of Oregon, declare that: (a) A basic tenet of a democratic society is that a person is presumed innocent and should not be punished until proven guilty; (b) The property of a person generally should not be forfeited in a forfeiture proceeding by government unless and until that person is convicted of a crime involving the property; (c) The value of property forfeited should be proportional to the specific conduct for which the owner of the property has been convicted; and (d) Proceeds from forfeited property should be used for treatment of drug abuse unless otherwise specified by law for another purpose. (3) Forfeitures prohibited without conviction. Except as provided in this section, a judgment of forfeiture of property in a civil forfeiture proceeding by the State or any of its political subdivisions may not be entered until and unless the person claiming the property is convicted of a crime in Oregon or another jurisdiction and the property: (a) Constitutes proceeds of the crime for which the claimant has been convicted; (b) Was instrumental in committing or facilitating the crime for which the claimant has been convicted; (c) Constitutes proceeds of one or more other crimes similar to the crime for which the claimant was convicted; or (d) Was instrumental in committing or facilitating one or more other crimes similar to the crime for which the claimant was convicted. (4) Forfeiture based on similar crimes. Property may be forfeited under paragraph (c) or (d) of subsection (3) of this section only if the claimant is notified in writing of the other crime or crimes claimed to be similar to the crime for which the claimant was convicted. The notice must be given at the time the claimant is given notice of the seizure of the property for forfeiture, and the claimant must have an opportunity to challenge the seizure and forfeiture of the property. (5) Forfeiture without conviction of claimant. The property of a claimant who has not been convicted of a crime may be forfeited in a civil forfeiture proceeding only if the claimant consents to the forfeiture of the property or the forfeiting agency proves the property constitutes proceeds or an instrumentality of crime committed by another person as described in subsection (3) of this section and: (a) The claimant took the property with the intent to defeat forfeiture of the property; (b) The claimant knew or should have known that the property constituted proceeds or an instrumentality of criminal conduct; or (c) The claimant acquiesced in the criminal conduct. A person shall be considered to have acquiesced in criminal conduct if the person knew of the criminal conduct and failed to take reasonable action under the circumstances to terminate the criminal conduct or prevent use of the property to commit or facilitate the criminal conduct. (6) Standard of proof. (a) Except as provided in paragraph (b) of this subsection, if the property to be forfeited in a civil forfeiture action is personal property, the forfeiting agency must prove the elements specified in subsection (3) or (5) of this section by a preponderance of the evidence. If the property to be forfeited in a civil forfeiture action is real property, the forfeiting agency must prove the elements specified in subsection (3) or (5) of this section by clear and convincing evidence. (b) If a forfeiting agency establishes in a forfeiture proceeding that cash, weapons or negotiable instruments were found in close proximity to controlled substances or to instrumentalities of criminal conduct, the burden is on any person claiming the cash, weapons or negotiable instruments to prove by a preponderance of the evidence that the cash, weapons or negotiable instruments are not proceeds of criminal conduct or an instrumentality of criminal conduct. (7) Value of property forfeited. The value of the property forfeited under the provisions of this section may not be excessive and shall be substantially proportional to the specific conduct for which the owner of the property has been convicted. For purposes of this section, "property" means any interest in anything of value, including the whole of any lot or tract of land and tangible and intangible personal property, including currency, instruments or securities or any other kind of privilege, interest, claim or right whether due or to become due. Nothing in this section shall prohibit a person from voluntarily giving a judgment of forfeiture. (8) Financial institutions. In a civil forfeiture proceeding, if a financial institution claiming an interest in the property demonstrates that it holds an interest, the financial institution's interest is not subject to forfeiture.

Add this to your briefcase to access full text.

History

Created through initiative petition filed Jan. 5, 2000, and adopted by the people Nov. 7, 2000; Amendment proposed by S.J.R. 18, 2007, and adopted by the people May 20, 2008; Created through initiative petition filed Nov. 10, 1999, and adopted by the people Nov. 7, 2000

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Oregon Const. art. XV, § 10, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/constitution/or/XV/10.