39 CFR § 3012.7

39 CFR · Postal Service

§ 3012.7 — Penalty for violation of ex parte communication rules.

39 CFR § 3012.7

TitleTitle 39: Postal Service PartPart 3012: Ex Parte Communications

SourceeCFR (current through Mar 31, 2026)

This text of 39 C.F.R. § 3012.7 (Penalty for violation of ex parte communication rules.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

39 C.F.R. § 3012.7 (2026).

Text

§ 3012.7 Penalty for violation of ex parte communication rules.

(a)The penalties for violation of ex parte communication rules specified in this section are applicable only to:

(1)Nature of postal service proceedings conducted pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3661(c);

(2)Appeal of Postal Service decisions to close or consolidate any post office conducted pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 404(d)(5); and

(3)Rate or service complaints conducted pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3662.

(b)Upon notice of a communication knowingly made or knowingly caused to be made by a participant in violation of § 3012.5(a), the Commission or presiding officer may, to the extent consistent with the interests of justice and the policy of the underlying statutes, require the participant to show cause why the participant's claim or intere

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

§ 3012.7 Penalty for violation of ex parte communication rules.

(a) The penalties for violation of ex parte communication rules specified in this section are applicable only to:

(1) Nature of postal service proceedings conducted pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3661(c);

(2) Appeal of Postal Service decisions to close or consolidate any post office conducted pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 404(d)(5); and

(3) Rate or service complaints conducted pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3662.

(b) Upon notice of a communication knowingly made or knowingly caused to be made by a participant in violation of § 3012.5(a), the Commission or presiding officer may, to the extent consistent with the interests of justice and the policy of the underlying statutes, require the participant to show cause why the participant's claim or interest in the proceeding should not be dismissed, denied, disregarded, or otherwise adversely affected on account of such violation.

(c) The Commission may, to the extent consistent with the interests of justice and the policy of the underlying statutes administered by the Commission, consider a violation of § 3012.5(a) sufficient grounds for a decision adverse to a party who has knowingly committed such violation or knowingly caused such violation to occur.

[81 FR 42541, June 30, 2016, as amended at 85 FR 9645, Feb. 19, 2020]