FEDERAL · 9 U.S.C. · Chapter 2
Order to compel arbitration; appointment of arbitrators
Current through Pub. L. 119-102
Title 9 — Arbitration·Ch. 2 — CONVENTION ON THE RECOGNITION AND ENFORCEMENT OF FOREIGN ARBITRAL AWARDS
A court having jurisdiction under this chapter may direct that arbitration be held in accordance with the agreement at any place therein provided for, whether that place is within or without the United States. Such court may also appoint arbitrators in accordance with the provisions of the agreement.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
9 U.S.C. § 206 (Order to compel arbitration; appointment of arbitrators) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Century Indemnity Co. v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's, London
584 F.3d 513 (Third Circuit, 2009)
Intergen N v. v. Grina
344 F.3d 134 (First Circuit, 2003)
Cargill International S.A., and Cargill, B v. V. M/t Pavel Dybenko, Her Engines, Tackle, Etc., in Rem Novorossiysk Shipping Co., in Personam
991 F.2d 1012 (Second Circuit, 1993)
Francisco v. Stolt Achievement MT
293 F.3d 270 (Fifth Circuit, 2002)
McCreary Tire & Rubber Company v. Ceat S.P.A. v. Mellon Bank, N.A. Garnishee
501 F.2d 1032 (Third Circuit, 1974)
Richard Scott Bushley v. Credit Suisse First Boston, a Delaware Corporation
360 F.3d 1149 (First Circuit, 2004)
Encyclopaedia Universalis S.A. v. Encyclopaedia Britannica, Inc., Docket No. 04-0288-Cv
403 F.3d 85 (Second Circuit, 2005)
Acosta v. Master Maintenance & Construction Inc.
452 F.3d 373 (Fifth Circuit, 2006)
Thomas v. Carnival Corp.
573 F.3d 1113 (Eleventh Circuit, 2009)
Sedco, Inc. v. Petroleos Mexicanos Mexican National Oil Co.
767 F.2d 1140 (Fifth Circuit, 1985)
NCR Corp. v. Korala Associates, Ltd.
512 F.3d 807 (Sixth Circuit, 2008)
Control Screening LLC v. Technological Application & Production Co. (Tecapro), HCMC-Vietnam
687 F.3d 163 (Third Circuit, 2012)
Czarina, L.L.C. v. W. F. Poe Syndicate
358 F.3d 1286 (Eleventh Circuit, 2004)
E.A.S.T., Inc. Of Stamford, Connecticut v. M/v Alaia, Advance Co., Inc., Claimant-Appellant
876 F.2d 1168 (Fifth Circuit, 1989)
I.T.A.D. Associates, Inc. v. Podar Brothers
636 F.2d 75 (Fourth Circuit, 1981)
Martinez v. Colombian Emeralds, Inc.
51 V.I. 174 (Supreme Court of The Virgin Islands, 2009)
Cargill Rice, Inc. v. Empresa Nicaraguense Dealimentos Basicos
25 F.3d 223 (Fourth Circuit, 1994)
Pine Top Receivables of Illinois, LLC v. Banco De Seguros Del Estado
771 F.3d 980 (Seventh Circuit, 2014)
Phoenix Aktiengesellschaft v. Ecoplas, Inc. (Formerly Known as Plastek Corporation, Formerly Known as Plaslok Corporation)
391 F.3d 433 (Second Circuit, 2004)
Antco Shipping Co., Ltd. v. SIDERMAR S. P. A.
417 F. Supp. 207 (S.D. New York, 1976)
Source Credit
History
(Added Pub. L. 91–368, §1, July 31, 1970, 84 Stat. 693.)
Editorial Notes
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
Effective Date
Section effective upon the entry into force of the Convention on Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards with respect to the United States (Dec. 29, 1970), see section 4 of Pub. L. 91–368, set out as a note under section 201 of this title.
Effective Date
Section effective upon the entry into force of the Convention on Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards with respect to the United States (Dec. 29, 1970), see section 4 of Pub. L. 91–368, set out as a note under section 201 of this title.