FEDERAL · 9 U.S.C. · Chapter 1
Papers filed with order on motions; judgment; docketing; force and effect; enforcement
9 U.S.C. § 13
Title9 — Arbitration
Chapter1 — GENERAL PROVISIONS
This text of 9 U.S.C. § 13 (Papers filed with order on motions; judgment; docketing; force and effect; enforcement) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
9 U.S.C. § 13.
Text
The party moving for an order confirming, modifying, or correcting an award shall, at the time such order is filed with the clerk for the entry of judgment thereon, also file the following papers with the clerk:
(a)The agreement; the selection or appointment, if any, of an additional arbitrator or umpire; and each written extension of the time, if any, within which to make the award.
(b)The award.
(c)Each notice, affidavit, or other paper used upon an application to confirm, modify, or correct the award, and a copy of each order of the court upon such an application.
The judgment shall be docketed as if it was rendered in an action.
The judgment so entered shall have the same force and effect, in all respects, as, and be subject to all the provisions of law relating to, a judgment in an
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Fidelity Federal Bank, Fsb, a Federally Chartered Savings Bank v. Durga Ma Corporation, a New Jersey Corporation
387 F.3d 1021 (Ninth Circuit, 2004)
Thai-Lao Lignite (Thailand) Co. v. Government of the Lao People's Democratic Republic
864 F.3d 172 (Second Circuit, 2017)
AIG Baker Sterling Heights, LLC v. American Multi-Cinema, Inc.
508 F.3d 995 (Eleventh Circuit, 2007)
MCI Telecommunications Corp. v. Exalon Industries, Inc.
138 F.3d 426 (First Circuit, 1998)
Pfizer Inc., a Delaware Corporation v. Margaret Uprichard, an Individual
422 F.3d 124 (Third Circuit, 2005)
The National Railroad Passenger Corporation v. The Chesapeake and Ohio Railway Company
551 F.2d 136 (Seventh Circuit, 1977)
W. Dow Hamm III Corp. v. Millennium Income Fund, L.L.C.
237 S.W.3d 745 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2007)
Ddi Seamless Cylinder International, Incorporated, and Seamless Cylinder International Corporation v. General Fire Extinguisher Corporation
14 F.3d 1163 (Seventh Circuit, 1994)
FIA Card Services, N.A. v. Weaver
62 So. 3d 709 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 2011)
Asset Acceptance, LLC v. Tyler
2012 IL App (1st) 093559 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 2012)
In Re Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld, LLP
252 S.W.3d 480 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2008)
Hatzlachh Supply, Inc. v. Moishe's Electronics Inc.
848 F. Supp. 25 (S.D. New York, 1994)
Amicizia Societa Navegazione v. Chilean Nitrate & Iodine Sales Corp.
184 F. Supp. 116 (S.D. New York, 1959)
MBNA America Bank, N.A. v. Christianson
659 S.E.2d 209 (Court of Appeals of South Carolina, 2008)
Weldon v. Asset Acceptance, LLC
896 N.E.2d 1181 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 2008)
Phillips v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc.
623 F. Supp. 493 (D. Minnesota, 1985)
Radiant Star Enterprises, L.L.C. v. Metropolis Condominium Association
2018 IL App (1st) 171844 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 2018)
Google LLC v. Spivak
(W.D. Washington, 2024)
Bungie Inc v. Aimjunkies.com
(W.D. Washington, 2023)
GAF Corp. v. Bamber
29 S.W.3d 650 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2000)
Source Credit
History
(July 30, 1947, ch. 392, 61 Stat. 673.)
Editorial Notes
Derivation
Act Feb. 12, 1925, ch. 213, §13, 43 Stat. 886.
Act Feb. 12, 1925, ch. 213, §13, 43 Stat. 886.
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
9 U.S.C. § 13, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/9/13.