FEDERAL · 8 U.S.C. · Chapter SUBCHAPTER II—ELIGIBILITY FOR STATE AND LOCAL PUBLIC BENEFITS PROGRAMS
Limitation on eligibility for preferential treatment of aliens not lawfully present on basis of residence for higher education benefits
8 U.S.C. § 1623
Title8 — Aliens and Nationality
ChapterSUBCHAPTER II—ELIGIBILITY FOR STATE AND LOCAL PUBLIC BENEFITS PROGRAMS
This text of 8 U.S.C. § 1623 (Limitation on eligibility for preferential treatment of aliens not lawfully present on basis of residence for higher education benefits) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
8 U.S.C. § 1623.
Text
(a)In general
Notwithstanding any other provision of law, an alien who is not lawfully present in the United States shall not be eligible on the basis of residence within a State (or a political subdivision) for any postsecondary education benefit unless a citizen or national of the United States is eligible for such a benefit (in no less an amount, duration, and scope) without regard to whether the citizen or national is such a resident.
(b)Effective date
This section shall apply to benefits provided on or after July 1, 1998.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Martinez v. Regents of University of California
241 P.3d 855 (California Supreme Court, 2010)
De Vries v. Regents of the University of California
6 Cal. App. 5th 574 (California Court of Appeal, 2016)
Doe v. St. Louis Community College
526 S.W.3d 329 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2017)
Young Conservatives v. Smatresk
73 F.4th 304 (Fifth Circuit, 2023)
State ex rel. Brnovich v. Maricopa County Community College District Board
395 P.3d 714 (Court of Appeals of Arizona, 2017)
Day v. Sebelius
376 F. Supp. 2d 1022 (D. Kansas, 2005)
Ruiz v. Robinson
892 F. Supp. 2d 1321 (S.D. Florida, 2012)
Opinion No.
(Arkansas Attorney General Reports, 2008)
Opinion No.
(Texas Attorney General Reports, 2009)
Young Conservatives of Texas Foundation v. The University of North Texas
(E.D. Texas, 2021)
Foss v. Abor
(Court of Appeals of Arizona, 2019)
Martinez v. Regents of University of California
166 Cal. App. 4th 1121 (California Court of Appeal, 2008)
Source Credit
History
(Pub. L. 104–208, div. C, title V, §505, Sept. 30, 1996, 110 Stat. 3009–672.)
Editorial Notes
Editorial Notes
Codification
Section was enacted as part of the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996, and as part of the Omnibus Consolidated Appropriations Act, 1997, and not as part of title IV of the Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act of 1996 which comprises this chapter.
Codification
Section was enacted as part of the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996, and as part of the Omnibus Consolidated Appropriations Act, 1997, and not as part of title IV of the Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act of 1996 which comprises this chapter.
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
8 U.S.C. § 1623, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/8/1623.