FEDERAL · 7 U.S.C. · Chapter 12

Monopolizing or restraining trade and unduly enhancing prices prohibited; remedy and procedure

7 U.S.C. § 292
Title7Agriculture
Chapter12 — ASSOCIATIONS OF AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTS PRODUCERS

This text of 7 U.S.C. § 292 (Monopolizing or restraining trade and unduly enhancing prices prohibited; remedy and procedure) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
7 U.S.C. § 292.

Text

If the Secretary of Agriculture shall have reason to believe that any such association monopolizes or restrains trade in interstate or foreign commerce to such an extent that the price of any agricultural product is unduly enhanced by reason thereof, he shall serve upon such association a complaint stating his charge in that respect, to which complaint shall be attached, or contained therein, a notice of hearing, specifying a day and place not less than thirty days after the service thereof, requiring the association to show cause why an order should not be made directing it to cease and desist from monopolization or restraint of trade. An association so complained of may at the time and place so fixed show cause why such order should not be entered. The evidence given on such a hearing sh

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Maryland & Virginia Milk Producers Assn., Inc. v. United States
362 U.S. 458 (Supreme Court, 1960)
153 case citations
National Broiler Marketing Ass'n v. United States
436 U.S. 816 (Supreme Court, 1978)
81 case citations
Hiatt Grain & Feed, Inc. v. Bergland
446 F. Supp. 457 (D. Kansas, 1978)
35 case citations
United States of America, Cross-Appellee v. Dairymen, Inc., Cross-Appellant
660 F.2d 192 (Sixth Circuit, 1982)
30 case citations
United States v. Maryland Cooperative Milk Producers, Inc.
145 F. Supp. 151 (District of Columbia, 1956)
21 case citations
Jarita Mesa Livestock Grazing Ass'n v. United States Forest Service
58 F. Supp. 3d 1191 (D. New Mexico, 2014)
17 case citations
Fairdale Farms, Inc. v. Yankee Milk, Inc.
635 F.2d 1037 (Second Circuit, 1980)
14 case citations
Marketing Assistance Plan, Inc. v. Associated Milk Producers, Inc.
338 F. Supp. 1019 (S.D. Texas, 1972)
12 case citations
United States v. Borden Co.
28 F. Supp. 177 (N.D. Illinois, 1939)
12 case citations
April v. National Cranberry Association
168 F. Supp. 919 (D. Massachusetts, 1958)
8 case citations
Consolidated Dairy Products Co. v. Bar-T Ranch Dairy, Inc.
642 P.2d 1240 (Washington Supreme Court, 1982)
5 case citations
Sunkist Growers, Inc. v. Federal Trade Commission
464 F. Supp. 302 (C.D. California, 1979)
3 case citations
Northland Cranberries, Inc. v. Ocean Spray Cranberries, Inc.
382 F. Supp. 2d 221 (D. Massachusetts, 2004)
1 case citations

Source Credit

History

(Feb. 18, 1922, ch. 57, §2, 42 Stat. 388.)

Editorial Notes

Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries

Restriction on Use of Funds Respecting Study, Investigation, or Prosecution of any Agricultural Cooperative or Study or Investigation of any Agricultural Marketing Orders
For provisions restricting the use of funds authorized to be appropriated to carry out section 41 et seq. of Title 15, Commerce and Trade, for fiscal year 1980, 1981, or 1982, for the purpose of conducting any study, investigation, or prosecution of any provisions of this chapter, see section 20 of Pub. L. 96–252, set out as a note under section 57c of Title 15.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
7 U.S.C. § 292, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/7/292.