FEDERAL · 7 U.S.C. · Chapter 1

Commodity whistleblower incentives and protection

7 U.S.C. § 26
Title7Agriculture
Chapter1 — COMMODITY EXCHANGES

This text of 7 U.S.C. § 26 (Commodity whistleblower incentives and protection) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
7 U.S.C. § 26.

Text

(a)Definitions In this section: The term "covered judicial or administrative action" means any judicial or administrative action brought by the Commission under this chapter that results in monetary sanctions exceeding $1,000,000. The term "Fund" means the Commodity Futures Trading Commission Customer Protection Fund established under subsection (g). The term "monetary sanctions", when used with respect to any judicial or administrative action means—
(A)any monies, including penalties, disgorgement, restitution, and interest ordered to be paid; and
(B)any monies deposited into a disgorgement fund or other fund pursuant to section 7246(b) of title 15, as a result of such action or any settlement of such action. The term "original information" means information that—
(A)is derived from t

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Epic Systems Corp. v. Lewis
584 U.S. 497 (Supreme Court, 2018)
890 case citations
Compucredit Corp. v. Greenwood
132 S. Ct. 665 (Supreme Court, 2012)
338 case citations
Maine Community Health Options v. United States
140 S. Ct. 1308 (Supreme Court, 2020)
173 case citations
Daly v. Citigroup Inc.
939 F.3d 415 (Second Circuit, 2019)
114 case citations
Ashley Walthour v. Chipio Windshield Repair, LLC
745 F.3d 1326 (Eleventh Circuit, 2014)
56 case citations
Stephen Morris v. Ernst & Young
834 F.3d 975 (Ninth Circuit, 2016)
51 case citations
In Re Natural Gas Commodity Litigation
337 F. Supp. 2d 498 (S.D. New York, 2004)
35 case citations
Kevin Ziober v. Blb Resources, Inc.
839 F.3d 814 (Ninth Circuit, 2016)
28 case citations
Armand Santoro v. Accenture Federal Services, LL
748 F.3d 217 (Fourth Circuit, 2014)
14 case citations
Brian Sexton v. Panel Processing, Inc.
754 F.3d 332 (Sixth Circuit, 2014)
14 case citations
Boris Khazin v. TD Ameritrade Holding Corp
773 F.3d 488 (Third Circuit, 2014)
12 case citations
Chu v. U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission
823 F.3d 1245 (Ninth Circuit, 2016)
8 case citations
Jamie Holmes v. Air Liquide USA, L.L.C.
498 F. App'x 405 (Fifth Circuit, 2012)
4 case citations
Berman v. Neo@Ogilvy LLC
72 F. Supp. 3d 404 (S.D. New York, 2014)
4 case citations
Adam U. Steines v. Westgate Palace, L.L.C.
113 F.4th 1335 (Eleventh Circuit, 2024)
3 case citations
James v. Conceptus, Inc.
851 F. Supp. 2d 1020 (S.D. Texas, 2012)
1 case citations
Elsasser v. DV Trading, LLC
(N.D. Illinois, 2020)
Johnson v. Oystacher
(N.D. Illinois, 2018)

Source Credit

History

(Sept. 21, 1922, ch. 369, §23, as added Pub. L. 111–203, title VII, §748, July 21, 2010, 124 Stat. 1739.)

Editorial Notes

Editorial Notes

Prior Provisions
A prior section 26, act Sept. 21, 1922, ch. 369, §23, as added Jan. 11, 1983, Pub. L. 97–444, title II, §236, 96 Stat. 2324, provided for special studies to be conducted by Commission, Board of Governors of Federal Reserve System, and Securities and Exchange Commission, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 102–546, title IV, §402(15), Oct. 28, 1992, 106 Stat. 3625.

Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries

Effective Date
Section effective on the later of 360 days after July 21, 2010, or, to the extent a provision of subtitle A (§§711–754) of title VII of Pub. L. 111–203 requires a rulemaking, not less than 60 days after publication of the final rule or regulation implementing such provision of subtitle A, see section 754 of Pub. L. 111–203, set out as an Effective Date of 2010 Amendment note under section 1a of this title.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
7 U.S.C. § 26, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/7/26.