FEDERAL · 7 U.S.C. · Chapter SUBCHAPTER III—PLANT VARIETY PROTECTION AND RIGHTS
Limitation of damages; marking and notice
7 U.S.C. § 2567
This text of 7 U.S.C. § 2567 (Limitation of damages; marking and notice) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
7 U.S.C. § 2567.
Text
Owners may give notice to the public by physically associating with or affixing to the container of seed of a variety or by fixing to the variety, a label containing either the words "Unauthorized Propagation Prohibited" or the words "Unauthorized Seed Multiplication Prohibited" and after the certificate issues, such additional words as "U.S. Protected Variety". In the event the variety is distributed by authorization of the owner and is received by the infringer without such marking, no damages shall be recovered against such infringer by the owner in any action for infringement, unless the infringer has actual notice or knowledge that propagation is prohibited or that the variety is a protected variety, in which event damages may be recovered only for infringement occurring after such no
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Syngenta Seeds, Inc. v. Delta Cotton Co-Operative, Inc.
457 F.3d 1269 (Federal Circuit, 2006)
United States v. $6,976,934.65, Plus Interest Deposited Into Royal Bank of Scotland International, Account No. 2029-56141070, Held in the Name of Soulbury Ltd.
554 F.3d 123 (D.C. Circuit, 2009)
Asgrow Seed Co. v. Winterboer
795 F. Supp. 915 (N.D. Iowa, 1991)
Edward Showmaker v. Advanta Usa, Inc. (Formally Known as Garst Seed Company and Doing Business as Garst Seed Company)
411 F.3d 1366 (Federal Circuit, 2005)
Showmaker v. Advanta USA
(Federal Circuit, 2005)
MIXON SEED SERVICE INC v. HILL
(M.D. Georgia, 2025)
AGSouth Genetics, LLC v. Georgia Farm Services, LLC
22 F. Supp. 3d 1342 (M.D. Georgia, 2014)
Arizona Grain Incorporated v. Barkley Ag Enterprises LLC
(D. Arizona, 2019)
Source Credit
History
(Pub. L. 91–577, title III, §127, Dec. 24, 1970, 84 Stat. 1557; Pub. L. 96–574, §19(b), Dec. 22, 1980, 94 Stat. 3351; Pub. L. 103–349, §11, Oct. 6, 1994, 108 Stat. 3142.)
Editorial Notes
Editorial Notes
Amendments
1994—Pub. L. 103–349 in first sentence struck out "novel" before "variety or" and before "variety, a", and in second sentence struck out "novel" before "variety is distributed".
1980—Pub. L. 96–574 substituted "either the words 'Unauthorized Propagation Prohibited' or the words 'Unauthorized Seed Multiplication Prohibited' " for "the words 'Propagation Prohibited' ".
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
Effective Date of 1994 Amendment
Amendment by Pub. L. 103–349 effective 180 days after Oct. 6, 1994, see section 15 of Pub. L. 103–349, set out as a note under section 2401 of this title.
Amendments
1994—Pub. L. 103–349 in first sentence struck out "novel" before "variety or" and before "variety, a", and in second sentence struck out "novel" before "variety is distributed".
1980—Pub. L. 96–574 substituted "either the words 'Unauthorized Propagation Prohibited' or the words 'Unauthorized Seed Multiplication Prohibited' " for "the words 'Propagation Prohibited' ".
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
Effective Date of 1994 Amendment
Amendment by Pub. L. 103–349 effective 180 days after Oct. 6, 1994, see section 15 of Pub. L. 103–349, set out as a note under section 2401 of this title.
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
7 U.S.C. § 2567, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/7/2567.