FEDERAL · 7 U.S.C. · Chapter 57
Remedy for infringement of plant variety protection
Current through Pub. L. 119-102
An owner shall have remedy by civil action for infringement of plant variety protection under section 2541 of this title. If a variety is sold under the name of a variety shown in a certificate, there is a prima facie presumption that it is the same variety.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
7 U.S.C. § 2561 (Remedy for infringement of plant variety protection) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Public Varieties of Mississippi, Inc. v. Sun Valley Seed Co.
734 F. Supp. 250 (N.D. Mississippi, 1990)
Edward Showmaker v. Advanta Usa, Inc. (Formally Known as Garst Seed Company and Doing Business as Garst Seed Company)
411 F.3d 1366 (Federal Circuit, 2005)
Showmaker v. Advanta USA
(Federal Circuit, 2005)
MIXON SEED SERVICE INC v. HILL
(M.D. Georgia, 2025)
Turfgrass Group, Inc. v. Northeast Louisiana Turf Farms, LLC
58 F. Supp. 3d 688 (W.D. Louisiana, 2014)
Source Credit
History
(Pub. L. 91–577, title III, §121, Dec. 24, 1970, 84 Stat. 1556; Pub. L. 103–349, §13(t), Oct. 6, 1994, 108 Stat. 3144.)
Editorial Notes
Editorial Notes
Amendments
1994—Pub. L. 103–349 struck out "his" before "plant" in first sentence.
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
Effective Date of 1994 Amendment
Amendment by Pub. L. 103–349 effective 180 days after Oct. 6, 1994, see section 15 of Pub. L. 103–349, set out as a note under section 2401 of this title.
Amendments
1994—Pub. L. 103–349 struck out "his" before "plant" in first sentence.
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
Effective Date of 1994 Amendment
Amendment by Pub. L. 103–349 effective 180 days after Oct. 6, 1994, see section 15 of Pub. L. 103–349, set out as a note under section 2401 of this title.