7 U.S.C. § 228c — Federal preemption of State and local requirements

FEDERAL · 7 U.S.C. · Chapter SUBCHAPTER V—GENERAL PROVISIONS

Federal preemption of State and local requirements

7 U.S.C. § 228c

ChapterSUBCHAPTER V—GENERAL PROVISIONS

This text of 7 U.S.C. § 228c (Federal preemption of State and local requirements) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

7 U.S.C. § 228c.

Text

No requirement of any State or territory of the United States, or any subdivision thereof, or the District of Columbia, with respect to bonding of packers or prompt payment by packers for livestock purchases may be enforced upon any packer operating in compliance with the bonding provisions under section 204 of this title, and prompt payment provisions of section 228b of this title, respectively: Provided, That this section shall not preclude a State from enforcing a requirement, with respect to payment for livestock purchased by a packer at a stockyard subject to this chapter, which is not in conflict with this chapter or regulations thereunder: Provided further, That this section shall not preclude a State from enforcing State law or regulations with respect to any packer not subject to 

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

No requirement of any State or territory of the United States, or any subdivision thereof, or the District of Columbia, with respect to bonding of packers or prompt payment by packers for livestock purchases may be enforced upon any packer operating in compliance with the bonding provisions under section 204 of this title, and prompt payment provisions of section 228b of this title, respectively: Provided, That this section shall not preclude a State from enforcing a requirement, with respect to payment for livestock purchased by a packer at a stockyard subject to this chapter, which is not in conflict with this chapter or regulations thereunder: Provided further, That this section shall not preclude a State from enforcing State law or regulations with respect to any packer not subject to this chapter or section 204 of this title.

Dale Cooper, Doing Business as Cooper Livestock Marketing Agents, Inc., Plaintiff-Appellant/cross-Appellee v. American Automobile Insurance Company United States of America, Ex Rel. United States Department of Agriculture, Packers and Stockyards Administration, Defendants- Appellees/cross v. Kathy Diane Cooper Robert M. Rodenberger, Jr. Karen Sue Rodenberger Donald Blake Flora Blake Clarence John Cooper Norma Cooper, Third-Party

978 F.2d 602 (Third Circuit, 1992)

50 case citations

Fillippo v. S. Bonaccurso & Sons, Inc.

466 F. Supp. 1008 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 1978)

21 case citations

Hedrick v. S. Bonaccurso & Sons, Inc.

466 F. Supp. 1025 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 1978)

17 case citations

American Manufacturing Mutual Insurance v. Tison Hog Market, Inc.

182 F.3d 1284 (Eleventh Circuit, 1999)

11 case citations

Cooper v. American Automobile Insurance

978 F.3d 602 (Tenth Circuit, 1992)

8 case citations

American Manufacturers v. Tison Hog

182 F.3d 1284 (Eleventh Circuit, 1999)

Source Credit

History

(Aug. 15, 1921, ch. 64, title IV, §414, formerly §410, as added Pub. L. 94–410, §9, Sept. 13, 1976, 90 Stat. 1252; renumbered §414, Pub. L. 100–173, §9(1), Nov. 23, 1987, 101 Stat. 919.)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

7 U.S.C. § 228c, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/7/228c.

Text

Related

Source Credit

History

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack