FEDERAL · 7 U.S.C. · Chapter SUBCHAPTER III—STOCKYARDS AND STOCKYARD DEALERS
Proceedings for suspension of orders
7 U.S.C. § 217
Title7 — Agriculture
ChapterSUBCHAPTER III—STOCKYARDS AND STOCKYARD DEALERS
This text of 7 U.S.C. § 217 (Proceedings for suspension of orders) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
7 U.S.C. § 217.
Text
For the purposes of this subchapter, the provisions of all laws relating to the suspending or restraining the enforcement, operation, or execution of, or the setting aside in whole or in part the orders of the Interstate Commerce Commission, are made applicable to the jurisdiction, powers, and duties of the Secretary in enforcing the provisions of this subchapter, and to any person subject to the provisions of this subchapter.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Allen v. State Board of Elections
393 U.S. 544 (Supreme Court, 1968)
United States v. Morgan
307 U.S. 183 (Supreme Court, 1939)
Denver Union Stock Yard Co. v. United States
304 U.S. 470 (Supreme Court, 1938)
Denver Union Stock Yard Co. v. United States
57 F.2d 735 (D. Colorado, 1932)
St. Joseph Stock Yards Co. v. United States
11 F. Supp. 322 (W.D. Missouri, 1935)
Farmers' Livestock Commission Co. v. United States
54 F.2d 375 (E.D. Illinois, 1931)
Union Stock Yards Co. of Omaha, Ltd. v. United States
9 F. Supp. 864 (D. Nebraska, 1934)
American Commission Co. v. United States
11 F. Supp. 965 (D. Colorado, 1935)
United States v. Sosnowitz & Lotstein, Inc.
50 F. Supp. 586 (D. Connecticut, 1943)
Shields v. Utah Idaho Cent. R.
95 F.2d 911 (Tenth Circuit, 1938)
Sioux City Stock Yards Co. v. United States
49 F. Supp. 801 (N.D. Iowa, 1943)
American Live Stock Commission Co. v. United States
28 F.2d 63 (W.D. Oklahoma, 1928)
Nostrand Poultry Market, Inc. v. United States
59 F. Supp. 245 (E.D. New York, 1945)
Inghram v. Union Stock Yards Co.
5 F. Supp. 486 (D. Nebraska, 1933)
United States v. Roberts & Oake
1 F. Supp. 797 (N.D. Illinois, 1932)
Ackert v. Baltimore & O. R. Co.
115 F.2d 455 (Fourth Circuit, 1940)
Source Credit
History
(Aug. 15, 1921, ch. 64, title III, §316, 42 Stat. 168.)
Editorial Notes
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
Abolition of Interstate Commerce Commission and Transfer of Functions
Interstate Commerce Commission abolished and functions of Commission transferred, except as otherwise provided in Pub. L. 104–88, to Surface Transportation Board effective Jan. 1, 1996, by section 1302 of Title 49, Transportation, and section 101 of Pub. L. 104–88, set out as a note under section 1301 of Title 49. References to Interstate Commerce Commission deemed to refer to Surface Transportation Board, a member or employee of the Board, or Secretary of Transportation, as appropriate, see section 205 of Pub. L. 104–88, set out as a note under section 1301 of Title 49.
Abolition of Interstate Commerce Commission and Transfer of Functions
Interstate Commerce Commission abolished and functions of Commission transferred, except as otherwise provided in Pub. L. 104–88, to Surface Transportation Board effective Jan. 1, 1996, by section 1302 of Title 49, Transportation, and section 101 of Pub. L. 104–88, set out as a note under section 1301 of Title 49. References to Interstate Commerce Commission deemed to refer to Surface Transportation Board, a member or employee of the Board, or Secretary of Transportation, as appropriate, see section 205 of Pub. L. 104–88, set out as a note under section 1301 of Title 49.
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
7 U.S.C. § 217, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/7/217.