FEDERAL · 7 U.S.C. · Chapter SUBCHAPTER III—STOCKYARDS AND STOCKYARD DEALERS
Rates and charges generally; discrimination
7 U.S.C. § 206
Title7 — Agriculture
ChapterSUBCHAPTER III—STOCKYARDS AND STOCKYARD DEALERS
This text of 7 U.S.C. § 206 (Rates and charges generally; discrimination) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
7 U.S.C. § 206.
Text
All rates or charges made for any stockyard services furnished at a stockyard by a stockyard owner or market agency shall be just, reasonable, and nondiscriminatory, and any unjust, unreasonable, or discriminatory rate or charge is prohibited and declared to be unlawful: Provided, That rates and charges based upon percentages of the gross sales prices of livestock shall not be prohibited merely because they are based upon such percentages rather than on a per head basis.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Mccleneghan v. Union Stock Yards Co. Of Omaha
298 F.2d 659 (Eighth Circuit, 1962)
Giles Lowery Stockyards, Inc. D/B/A Lufkin Livestock Exchange v. Department of Agriculture
565 F.2d 321 (Fifth Circuit, 1977)
In the Matter of Samuels & Co., Inc., Bankrupt. Curtis R. Stowers v. James S. Mahon, Trustee, and C. I. T. Corporation
483 F.2d 557 (Fifth Circuit, 1973)
Jackson v. Swift-Eckrich, Inc.
836 F. Supp. 1447 (W.D. Arkansas, 1993)
Tagg Bros. & Moorhead v. United States
29 F.2d 750 (D. Nebraska, 1928)
Central Arkansas Auction Sale, Inc. v. Bergland
570 F.2d 724 (Eighth Circuit, 1978)
Western Iowa Farms Co. v. United States of America Bob Bergland, Secretary of Agriculture, Sioux City Stock Yards, Intervenor
629 F.2d 502 (Eighth Circuit, 1980)
Inghram v. Union Stock Yards Co. of Omaha, Ltd.
64 F.2d 390 (Eighth Circuit, 1933)
Denver Union Stockyard Co. v. Denver Live Stock Commission Co.
404 F.2d 1055 (Tenth Circuit, 1968)
Litvak Meat Co. v. Denver Union Stock Yard Co.
303 F. Supp. 715 (D. Colorado, 1969)
Central Arkansas Auction Sale, Inc. v. Bob Bergland
570 F.2d 724 (Eighth Circuit, 1978)
The Denver Union Stockyard Co. v. The Denver Live Stock Commission Co.
404 F.2d 1055 (Tenth Circuit, 1968)
McClenegman v. Union Stock Yards Co.
298 F.2d 659 (Eighth Circuit, 1962)
Verduzco v. Value Dental Centers Mesa West AZ LLC
(D. Arizona, 2021)
O. V. Handy Bros. v. Wallace
16 F. Supp. 662 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 1936)
Source Credit
History
(Aug. 15, 1921, ch. 64, title III, §305, 42 Stat. 164; Pub. L. 95–409, §1(a), Oct. 2, 1978, 92 Stat. 886.)
Editorial Notes
Editorial Notes
Amendments
1978—Pub. L. 95–409 inserted proviso that rates and charges based upon percentages of gross sales of livestock shall not be prohibited merely because based on such percentages rather than on a per head basis.
Amendments
1978—Pub. L. 95–409 inserted proviso that rates and charges based upon percentages of gross sales of livestock shall not be prohibited merely because based on such percentages rather than on a per head basis.
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
7 U.S.C. § 206, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/7/206.