FEDERAL · 7 U.S.C. · Chapter SUBCHAPTER II—PACKERS GENERALLY
Conclusiveness of order; appeal and review
7 U.S.C. § 194
This text of 7 U.S.C. § 194 (Conclusiveness of order; appeal and review) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
7 U.S.C. § 194.
Text
(a)Filing of petition; bond
An order made under section 193 of this title shall be final and conclusive unless within thirty days after service the packer or swine contractor appeals to the court of appeals for the circuit in which he has his principal place of business, by filing with the clerk of such court a written petition praying that the Secretary's order be set aside or modified in the manner stated in the petition, together with a bond in such sum as the court may determine, conditioned that such packer or swine contractor will pay the costs of the proceedings if the court so directs.
(b)Filing of record by Secretary
The clerk of the court shall immediately cause a copy of the petition to be delivered to the Secretary, and the Secretary shall thereupon file in the court the reco
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Yakus v. United States
321 U.S. 414 (Supreme Court, 1944)
James T. Cross v. United States
512 F.2d 1212 (Fourth Circuit, 1975)
Corner Post, Inc. v. Board of Governors
603 U.S. 799 (Supreme Court, 2024)
Armour and Company v. United States of America and Orville L. Freeman, Secretary of Agriculture
402 F.2d 712 (Seventh Circuit, 1968)
Capitol Packing Co. v. United States
350 F.2d 67 (Tenth Circuit, 1965)
Arkansas Valley Industries, Inc. v. Freeman
415 F.2d 713 (Eighth Circuit, 1969)
Cobb v. Yeutter
889 F.2d 724 (Sixth Circuit, 1989)
Major Lewis v. Earl L. Butz, Secretary of Agriculture and the United States of America
512 F.2d 681 (Eighth Circuit, 1975)
Swift & Co. v. Wallace
105 F.2d 848 (Seventh Circuit, 1939)
Texaco, Inc. v. Federal Power Commission, Texaco, Inc. v. Federal Power Commission, Public Service Commission of the State of New York, Intervenor. Sun Oil Company v. Federal Power Commission, Public Service Commission of the State of New York, Intervenor
329 F.2d 223 (D.C. Circuit, 1963)
Yee Gwing Mee v. Acheson
108 F. Supp. 502 (N.D. California, 1952)
Texaco, Inc. v. Federal Power Commission
329 F.2d 223 (D.C. Circuit, 1963)
United States v. Great American Veal, Inc.
998 F. Supp. 416 (D. New Jersey, 1998)
Bruhn's Freezer Meats of Chicago, Inc. v. United States Department of Agriculture
438 F.2d 1332 (Eighth Circuit, 1971)
Wilmington Provision Co. v. Wallace
72 F.2d 989 (Third Circuit, 1934)
ITT Continental Baking Co. v. United States
559 F. Supp. 454 (S.D. New York, 1983)
Corner Post, Inc. v. Board of Governors Revisions: 7/09/24
603 U.S. 799 (Supreme Court, 2024)
Source Credit
History
(Aug. 15, 1921, ch. 64, title II, §204, 42 Stat. 162; June 7, 1934, ch. 426, 48 Stat. 926; June 25, 1948, ch. 646, §32(a), 62 Stat. 991; May 24, 1949, ch. 139, §127, 63 Stat. 107; Pub. L. 85–791, §6(b), (c), Aug. 28, 1958, 72 Stat. 944; Pub. L. 98–620, title IV, §402(5), Nov. 8, 1984, 98 Stat. 3357; Pub. L. 107–171, title X, §10502(b)(1), May 13, 2002, 116 Stat. 509.)
Editorial Notes
Editorial Notes
Codification
Former subsec. (i), which extended the former term "circuit court of appeals", in case the principal place of business of the packer is in the District of Columbia, to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia, for the purposes of sections 191 to 195 of this title, was omitted from the Code as obsolete. The District of Columbia is a judicial circuit under sections 41 and 43 of Title 28, Judiciary and Judicial Procedure. See, also, Change of Name note below.
Amendments
2002—Subsecs. (a), (c), (g). Pub. L. 107–171 substituted "packer or swine contractor" for "packer" wherever appearing.
1984—Subsec. (d). Pub. L. 98–620 struck out provisions requiring proceedings in such cases in the court of appeals to be made a preferred cause and expedited in every way.
1958—Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 85–791 §6(b), substituted "thereupon file in the court" for "forthwith prepare, certify, and file in the court a full and accurate transcript of", and "as provided in section 2112 of Title 28" for "including the complaint, the evidence, and the report and order" in first sentence, and "record" for "transcript" in second sentence.
Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 85–791, §6(b), substituted "petition" for "transcript".
Subsec. (d). Pub. L. 85–791, §6(b), struck out "duly certified" after "admitted".
Subsec. (h). Pub. L. 85–791, §6(c), substituted "jurisdiction, which upon the finding of the record with it shall be exclusive," for "exclusive jurisdiction," and section "1254" for "347".
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
Change of Name
Act June 25, 1948, eff. Sept. 1, 1948, as amended May 24, 1949, substituted "court of appeals" for "circuit court of appeals", wherever appearing.
Act of June 7, 1934, provided that Court of Appeals in District of Columbia, should hereafter be known as the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia.
Effective Date of 1984 Amendment
Amendment by Pub. L. 98–620 not applicable to cases pending on Nov. 8, 1984, see section 403 of Pub. L. 98–620, set out as an Effective Date note under section 1657 of Title 28, Judiciary and Judicial Procedure.
Codification
Former subsec. (i), which extended the former term "circuit court of appeals", in case the principal place of business of the packer is in the District of Columbia, to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia, for the purposes of sections 191 to 195 of this title, was omitted from the Code as obsolete. The District of Columbia is a judicial circuit under sections 41 and 43 of Title 28, Judiciary and Judicial Procedure. See, also, Change of Name note below.
Amendments
2002—Subsecs. (a), (c), (g). Pub. L. 107–171 substituted "packer or swine contractor" for "packer" wherever appearing.
1984—Subsec. (d). Pub. L. 98–620 struck out provisions requiring proceedings in such cases in the court of appeals to be made a preferred cause and expedited in every way.
1958—Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 85–791 §6(b), substituted "thereupon file in the court" for "forthwith prepare, certify, and file in the court a full and accurate transcript of", and "as provided in section 2112 of Title 28" for "including the complaint, the evidence, and the report and order" in first sentence, and "record" for "transcript" in second sentence.
Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 85–791, §6(b), substituted "petition" for "transcript".
Subsec. (d). Pub. L. 85–791, §6(b), struck out "duly certified" after "admitted".
Subsec. (h). Pub. L. 85–791, §6(c), substituted "jurisdiction, which upon the finding of the record with it shall be exclusive," for "exclusive jurisdiction," and section "1254" for "347".
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
Change of Name
Act June 25, 1948, eff. Sept. 1, 1948, as amended May 24, 1949, substituted "court of appeals" for "circuit court of appeals", wherever appearing.
Act of June 7, 1934, provided that Court of Appeals in District of Columbia, should hereafter be known as the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia.
Effective Date of 1984 Amendment
Amendment by Pub. L. 98–620 not applicable to cases pending on Nov. 8, 1984, see section 403 of Pub. L. 98–620, set out as an Effective Date note under section 1657 of Title 28, Judiciary and Judicial Procedure.
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
7 U.S.C. § 194, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/7/194.